期刊文献+

基质固相分散-气相色谱法测定桃中3种残留杀真菌剂 被引量:1

GC Determination of 3 Residual Fungicides in Peach with Matrix Solid Phase Dispersion of Sample
下载PDF
导出
摘要 采用基质固相分散进行样品前处理,并用n-己烷及二氯甲烷作淋洗液,从桃中提取五氯苯胺、甲基五氯苯基硫醚和腐霉利3种杀真菌剂,所得淋出液蒸发至近干,残渣溶于1 mL丙酮中供气相色谱分析,用毛细管色谱柱及电子捕获检测器进行测定。基质匹配标准校正方法补偿基质效应。添加0.01,0.05,0.10 mg·L-1杀真菌剂混合标准的回收率为82.6%~109.7%,相对标准偏差为3.3%~9.6%,检出限(3S/N)为0.1~0.4μg·kg-1。 Three residual fungicides i. e., pentachloroaniline, methyl pentachlorophenyl sulfide and proeymidone, were separated from the peach sample by pretreatment with matrix solid phase dispersion, packing into a glass column and eluting with mixed solvent of n-hexane and dichloromethane. The eluate was evaporated to near dryness, and residue dissolved in 1 mL of acetone and used for GC-analysis. Capillary chromatographic column and electron capture detector were used in the GC-determination. Matrix matching method was used in preparation of calibration curve. Test for recovery was made at concentration levels of 0. 01, 0. 05 and 0. 10 mg ·L^-1 of the mixed standard solution of the fungicides, and values of recovery in the range of 82.6%-109. 7% were obtained, with values of RSD's (n=8) in the range of 3.3%-9. 6%. Detection limits (3S/N) found were range from 0. 1 to 0. 4 μg · kg^-1 for the 3 fungicides.
出处 《理化检验(化学分册)》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2009年第1期46-48,51,共4页 Physical Testing and Chemical Analysis(Part B:Chemical Analysis)
关键词 基质固相分散 气相色谱 残留的杀真菌剂 Matrix solid phase dispersion Gas chromatography Residual fungicides Peach
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Baker S A, Long A R, Short C R. Isolation of drug residues from tissues by solid phase dispersion[J]. J Chromatogr A, 1989,475 : 353-361.
  • 2Jalbert J, Gilbert R, Tetreault P, et al. Matrix effects affecting the indirect calibration of the static headspace gas chromatographic method used for dissolved gas analysis in dielectric liquids[J]. Anal Chem, 2003,75 (19) :5230-5239.
  • 3Hajslova J, Zrostlikowi J. Matrix efects in (ultra) trace analysis of pesticide residues in food and biotic matrices[J]. J Chromatogr A, 2003, 1000(1): 181- 197.
  • 4Egea G F J, Hernandez T M E, Almansa L E, et al. Matrix-effects of vegetable commodities in electron capture detection applied to pesticide multiresidue analysis[J]. J Chromatogr A, 2002,966(1) : 155-165.
  • 5Martinez J L, Vidal F J, Arrebola A, et al. Validation of a gas chromatographic tandem mass spectrometric method for analysis of pesticide residues in six food commodities: Selection of a reference matrix for calibration[J]. Chromatographia, 2004,59:321-327.
  • 6Schenck F J, Lehotay S J. Does further clean up reduce the matrix enhancement effect in gas chromatographic analysis of pesticide residues in food[J]. J Chromatogr A, 2000,868(1) :51-61.
  • 7Zrostlikova J, Haislova J, Godula M, et al. Performance of programmed temperature vaporizer, pulsed splitless and on column injection techniques in analysis of pesticide residues in plant matrices[J]. J Chromatogr A , 2001,937 (1) : 73-86.
  • 8Gonzalez C F, Otero R R, Grande B C, et al. Determination of fungicide residues in white grapes for winemaking by gas chromatography with mass spectrometric detection and assessment of matrix effects [J]. J AOAC Int, 2003,86(5):1008-1014.
  • 9Albero B, Sanchez-brunete C, Tadeo J L. Analysis of pesticides in honey by solid phase extraction and gas chromatography mass spectrometry[J]. J Agric Food Chem, 2004,52(19): 5828-5835.
  • 10Anastassiades M, Mastovska K, Lehotay S J. Evaluation of analyte protectants to improve gas chromatographic analysis of pesticides [J]. J Chromatogr A, 2003 ; 1015(1) : 163-184.

二级参考文献28

共引文献94

同被引文献8

引证文献1

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部