期刊文献+

中澳学生评教比较研究 被引量:4

Comparative Research on the Students' Evaluation of Teaching between China and Australia
原文传递
导出
摘要 文章对澳大利亚和我国的学生评教进行了比较分析,主要探讨了两者在评价标准的名称与评价指向、指标体系范围、调查结果的公布及其指向性、学生主体地位的体现、调查结果的使用等方面的区别。澳大利亚的学生评教经验对我国的评教无疑是有所启示的。 This paper has caparisoned students' evaluation of teaching between Australia and China, and mainly discussed the differences in the terms of evaluation criteria name and appraisal direction, the evaluation index system, the release of investigation results and its directivity, the embody of students leading role, the use of investigation results and so on. Undoubtedly, the experiences of students' evaluation of teaching in Australia can give us some inspirations.
作者 邵娟
机构地区 华东师范大学
出处 《大学(学术版)》 2009年第1期68-71,共4页
关键词 学生评教 大学生课程体验调查 评价标准 指标体系 students' evaluation of teaching, CEQ(Course Experience Questionnaire), evaluation criteria, index system
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献6

  • 1天野郁夫.高等教育の構造変動.教育社会学研究,2002,(70):39-58.
  • 2鲍威.進学者の目に映つた中国民営高等教育[J].東京大学教育学研究科紀要第42卷:223-233.
  • 3Trow,Martin.On Mass Higher Education and Institutional Diversity[R].Samuel Neaman Institute for Advanced Studies in Science and Technology,Technion-Israel Institute of Technology.2003.
  • 4Ainley & Johnson.The Course Experience Questionnaire 2000 Interim Report[R].ACER,2001.
  • 5Center for Postsecondary Research,School of Education Indiana University.Engaged Learning:Fostering Success for All Students (Annual Report 2006)[R].[2007-05-01].http://nsse,iub.edu/NSSE_ 2006_ Annual_ Report/docs/NSSE_ 2006_ Annual_ Report.pdf.
  • 6Saenz,V.B.& Barrera,D.S.Findings from the 2005 College Student Survey (CSS):National aggregates[R].Los Angeles:Higher Education Research Institute,2007.

共引文献48

同被引文献48

引证文献4

二级引证文献68

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部