期刊文献+

世界100强企业的业务组合 被引量:2

The Empirical Research on Business Portfolio of World Top 100
原文传递
导出
摘要 研究业务组合与企业经济绩效的关系,目的在于揭示业务组合类型对企业成长的作用,为企业界选择发展方式提供指导。世界100强企业成功的业务组合与经营绩效关系,对正在以更快步伐加入国际竞争的中国企业,具有重要的借鉴意义。本文对1997~2006年期间世界100强企业的业务组合类型及经营绩效间关系进行了实证分析,发现采取单一业务型和相关业务型业务组合的企业所占比重均有大幅下降,采取主导一体化、主导业务型和非相关业务型业务组合的企业所占比重均有不同程度的增加。不同业务组合类型企业的获利能力、运营能力和偿债能力均具有显著差异。 In order to open out how business portfolio effects enterprise growth, the paper researched the relationship between business portfolio and economic performance. The relationship between business portfolio and economic performance of successful enterprises such as the World Top 100 is very meaningful for Chinese enterprises. The paper empirically analyzed the relationship of the World Top 100 from 1997 to 2006. The empirical result found that the adoption of the single-business type and business-related portfolio type continued to show significant decline, however, the leading integration type, the leading business-related type and non-business related type portfolio of enterprise increased in varying degrees. Combination of different types of business enterprises profitability, solvency and ability to operate are significant differences.
作者 王玉 王丹
出处 《经济管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2008年第23期68-73,共6页 Business and Management Journal ( BMJ )
基金 王玉主持的上海财经大学211研究项目"跨国企业业务组合与经营战略研究"
关键词 业务组合 经营绩效 世界100强 business portfolio economic performance World Top 100
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

二级参考文献87

共引文献531

同被引文献24

  • 1Baines T. , Lightfoof H. W. , Evans S. , Neely A. State-of-the-art in Product Service Systems [J]. Proceedings of IMechE Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 2007,221(10):1543-1551.
  • 2Davies A. ,Brady T. , Hobday M. Charting a Path toward Integrated Solutions [J]. MIT Sloan Management Review,2006, (47) : 39 - 48.
  • 3Gebauer H. , Fleisch E. , Friedli T. Overcoming the Service Paradox in Manufacturing Companies [J]. Euro- pean Management Journal,2005, 23 (1) : 14 - 26.
  • 4Martin Falka, Fei Peng. The Increasing Service Intensity of European Manufacturing [J]. The Service Indus- tries Journal, 2012,12 (7) : 1-21.
  • 5. Mathieu V. Service Strategies within the Manufacturing Sector: Benefit, Cost and Partnership [J]. Interna- tional Journal of Service Industry Management, 2001, 12 (5) : 451-475.
  • 6Neely A. , Benedetinni O. , Visnjic I. The Servitization of Manufacturing: Further Evidence [C]. 18th Europe- an Operations, 2011.
  • 7Neely A. Exploring the Financial Consequences of the Servitization of Manufacturing [J]. Operations Man-agement Research,2008, 1 (2) : 103-118.
  • 8Oliva R. , Kallenberg R. Managing the Transition from Products to Services [J]. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 2003,14(2) : 1-10.
  • 9Vandermerwe S. , Rada J. Servitization of Business: Adding Value by Adding Services [J]. European Man- agement Journal,1988, 6 (4) :314 - 324.
  • 10Veronica Martinez. Challenges in Transforming Manufacturing Organizations into Product-service Providers [J]. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management,2010,21(4) :449-469.

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部