期刊文献+

不同比例的PLA-PGA支架对软骨细胞复合的影响 被引量:3

The Impact of Different Proportion of PLA Embeded PLA-PGA Ccaffold on Swine Chondrocytes
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的研究经聚乳酸(PLA)包埋后的不同比例PLA-聚羟基乙酸(PGA)组织工程支架对软骨细胞复合的影响及原因。方法分离培养小猪软骨细胞,并以5×107cells/mL的密度接种在经PLA包埋的不同比例PGA-PLA支架材料上,4h后检测软骨细胞在支架材料上的流失率,24h后检测软骨细胞在支架材料上的粘附率,并对支架材料进行电镜扫描,分析原因。结果随着支架材料中PLA比例的提高,软骨细胞的接种流失率上升,支架材料的接种负荷下降,24h时软骨细胞粘附率无明显差异。扫描电镜证实其原因。结论PLA包埋的PGA支架材料会降低对软骨细胞的接种负荷,但细胞粘附率无变化。 Objective To investigate the impact of different proportion of PLA embeded PLA-PGA scaffold on swine chondrocytes. Methods Swine chondrocytes were harvested and cultured, and seeded onto the PGA-PLA scaffold of different groups at the concentration of 5×10^7 cells/mL. The cell run off rate was examined after 4 hours, and the cell adherence rate was examined after 24 hours. In addition, we did the PGA-PLA scaffold was examined by scanning electron microscope. Results With the rise of the proportion of PLA, the run off rate of chondrocytes rose, the seeding load of the scaffold fell, and the cell adherence rate had no significant difference. Conclusion PLA embeded PLA-PGA scaffold will affect the seeding load of chondrocyte, but the cell adherence rate.
出处 《组织工程与重建外科杂志》 2008年第6期305-307,共3页 Journal of Tissue Engineering and Reconstructive Surgery
基金 国家高技术发展计划(863)重大专项(2002AA205021) 国家重点基础研究发展计划(973)(2005CB522702) 国家自然科学基金项目(30300353) 上海市重点实验室基金(06DZ22029)。
关键词 组织工程 聚羟基乙酸 聚乳酸 粘附率 软骨细胞 Tissue engineering PGA PLA Cell adherence rate Chondrocyte
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献2

  • 1Cao Y L,Plast Reconstr Surg,1997年,100卷,2期,1页
  • 2Cao Y L,42nd Annual Meeting of Orthopedic Research Society,1996年,18页

共引文献37

同被引文献69

  • 1张军军,任龙喜,程爱国,张志刚,王志强,张柳.PLA-MSCs复合培养物植入修复兔关节软骨缺损的实验研究[J].中国骨肿瘤骨病,2005,4(5):293-296. 被引量:3
  • 2Poole CA. Articular cartilage chondrons: form,function and failure. JAnat, 1997, 191(Ptl): 1-13.
  • 3Mcnickle AG, Provencher MT, Cole BJ. Overview of existing cartilagerepair technology. Sports Med Arthrosc, 2008,16(4): 196-201.
  • 4Thiede RM, Lu Y, Markel MD. A review of the treatment methods forcartilage defects. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatoi, 2012, 25(4): 263-272.
  • 5Hurtig M, Pearce S, Warren S, et al Arthroscopic mosaic arthroplastyin the equine third carpal bone. Vet Surg, 2001, 30(3): 228-239.
  • 6Solheim E,Hegna J, Oyen J, et al. Osteochondral autografting (mosa-icplasty) in articular cartilage defects in the knee: results at 5 to 9 years.Knee, 2010,17(1):84-87.
  • 7Bugbee WD. Fresh osteochondral allografts. J Knee Surg, 2002, 15(3):191-195.
  • 8Stevenson S, Dannucci GA, Sharkey NA, et al. The fate of articular car-tilage after transplantation of fresh and cryopreserved tissue-antigen-matched and mismatched osteochondral allografts in dogs. J BoneJoint Surg (Am), 1989,71(9): 1297-1307.
  • 9Danisovic L, Varga I,Zamborsky R, et al The tissue engineering of ar-ticular cartilage: cells, scaffolds and stimulating factors. Exp Biol Med(Maywood), 2012, 237(1): 10-17.
  • 10Chung C, Burdick JA. Engineering cartilage tissue. Adv Drug Del ivRev, 2008, 60(2): 243*262.

引证文献3

二级引证文献23

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部