期刊文献+

磁共振延迟成像时间对急性心肌梗死测定的影响 被引量:2

Effect of imaging time on infarct size estimation after acute myocardial infarction using delayed contrastenhancement magnetic resonance imaging
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的本研究探讨不间磁共振延迟成像(conlrast—enhanced magnetic resonance imaging,CeM—RI)时间是否影响急性心肌梗死(acute myoeadial infaretin,AMI)后梗死面积的测定。并探讨磁共振测定的射血分数与左室造影测定的射血分数的相关性。方法选择在2005年6月至2006年4月在复旦大学附属中山医院住院治疗的患者,27例首次确诊为急性心肌梗死的患者进行前瞻性研究,年龄(54.3±10.5)岁。所有患者均动态观察心肌酶谱的变化,并经冠脉造影明确,冠脉造影同时测定左室造影射血分数,磁共振(SIMENS1.ST)检查时间为心肌梗死后(13.2±5.2)d,磁共振检查方法是首先进行电影扫描,测定射血分数,然后经静脉以5mL/秒注入0.05mmol/kg Gd—DTPA行首过成像,最后经高压注射器静脉以2mL/s注入0.15mmol/kgGd—DTPA行延迟成像,测定心肌梗死面积,在延迟注药后5min开始延迟期采集。选择存在延迟增强高信号区的同一短轴层面,每间隔5min成像一次测定梗死面积,直至20min。采用配对t检验进行统计,并进行相关分析。结果27例患者在延迟CeMRI上均存在延迟增强区,27例患者测定的梗死面积为(17.9±9.8)%,测定CK峰值为(2003.5±1496.8)U/L,肌钙蛋白T峰值为(4.6±3.3)ng/mL。梗死面积与cK峰值的相关系数为r=0.819(P〈0.01),梗死面积与肌钙蛋白丁相关系数为r=0.517(P〈0.05)。存在梗死心肌的同一层面测定的梗死面积百分比在5min,10min,15min及20min时分别为(7.2±6.2)%,(8.5±7.4)%,(7.3±6.3)%及(6.9±6.4)%(10min与20min相比,P〈0.05):MR测定的左室射血分数与造影测定的射血分数相关系数为r=0.867(P〈0.01)。结论CeMRI可以诊断心肌梗死和定量测定梗死范围。磁共振测定与左室造影测定的射血分数密切相关。测定梗死范围时,不同延迟成像的时问影响梗死范围的测定。 Objective To investigate whether timing of image acquisition influenced infarct size estimation using delayed CeMRI, and the association of left ventricular ejection fraction between magnetic resonance imaging and left ventriealography was also studied. Method From Junary 2005 to April 2006, 27 first, onset AMI patients [ 23 male, mean age(54.3± 10.5) years ] were enrolled in this study. All patients received left ventriculography as well as coronary angiography. The average checking time was (13.2 ±5.2) days after the onset of AMI. MR imaging was performed with a 1.5-T magnet(SIMENS). After breath-hold cine images were acquired, patients received an intravenous bolus of 0.05 mmol/kg Gd-DTPA at a rate of 5 mL/s. A first-pass perfusion scan was acquired. Then a second bolus of 0.15 mmol/kg Gd-DTPA was given at a rate of 2 mL/s. After the hyperenhance- ment localized, the typical short axis slice with hyperenhancement was chosen to repeat imaging for measuring in- farct size every 5 minutes from 5 minutes after second injection of contrast until 20 minutes. Results Twexty-seren patients showed hyperenhancement at the delayed CeMRI and hypoenhancement at the first pass enhancement (FPE). The average infarct size estimated by CeMRI was (17.9± 9.8)% of LV mass. Myocardial enhancement at a representative short-axis slice was (7.2 ± 6.2) % of LV mass at 5 minutes, (8.5 ± 7.4) % at 10 minutes, (7.3 ± 6.3) % at 15 minutes and (6.9 ±6.4) % at 20 minutes respectively. There was significant difference between 10-minutes and 20-minutes enhancement size (P 〈 0.05). Correlations of EF obtained by cineventriculography and MR imaging were significant ( r = 0.867, P 〈 0.01 ). There were also correlations between infarction size and peak CK ( r = 0.819, P 〈 0.01), as well as peak cTNT ( r = 0.517, P 〈 0.05) levels. Conclusions Timing of image acquisition influenced infarct size quantification using delayed CeMRI when TI was kept constant.
出处 《中华急诊医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2009年第1期60-64,共5页 Chinese Journal of Emergency Medicine
基金 基金项目:国家自然科学基金(30671998) 上海曙光追踪计划资助(06GG03)
关键词 磁共振 对比剂 急性心肌梗死 左室射血分数 Magnetic resonance imaging Contrast Acute myocardial infarction Left ventricular ejection fraction
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1马剑英,钱菊英,葛均波,杨姗,葛雷,刘学波,林谨仪,胡昕婴,张峰,张少衡,黄榕翀,李延林,施鸿毓,樊冰.首过及延迟增强的磁共振成像技术在心肌梗死中的价值[J].中华心血管病杂志,2005,33(11):1027-1030. 被引量:9
  • 2Petersen SE, Molars OK, Horstick G, et al. Influence of contrast agent dose and image acquisition timing on the quantitative determination of nonviable myocardial tissue using delayed contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging[J]. J Cardiovasc Magnet Resort, 2004, 6(2) : 541- 548.
  • 3Ibrahim T, Nekolla SG, Hornke M, et al. Quantitative measurement of infarct size by contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging early after acute myocardial infarction. Comparison with single-photon emission tomography using Tc99m-sestamibi[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2005,45(4): 544-552.
  • 4Weinmann HJ, Laniado M, Mutzel W, et al. Phannacoknitics of Gd-DTPA/dimeglumine after intravenous injection into healthy volunteers [J]. Physinl Chem Phy Med NMR, 1984,16(2) : 167-172.
  • 5Klein C, Nekolla SG, Bengel FM, et al. Assessment of myocardial viability with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: comparison with positron emission tomography[ J ]. Circulation, 2002,105(2) : 162-167.
  • 6Fieno DS, Kim RJ, Chen EL, et al. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of myocardial at risk: distinction between reversible and irreversible injury throughout infarct healing [ J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2000,36(6) : 1985-1991.
  • 7Saeed M, Land G, Wendland MF, et al. Magnetic resonance characterization of the peri-infarction with necrosis-specific and extracellular non-specific contrast media[J]. Circulation, 2001,103(6):871-876.
  • 8Oshinski JN, Yang Z, Jones JR,et al. Imaging time after Gd-DTPA injection is critical in using delayed enhancement to determine infarct size accurately with magnetic resonance imaging[J].Circulation, 2001, 104 (23) :2838-2842.
  • 9Pfeffer MA, Braunwald E, Moye LA, et al. Effect of captopril on mortality and morbidity in patients with left ventricular dysfunction after myocardial infarction: results of the survival and ventricular enlargement trial. The SAVE investigators[J]. N Engl J Med, 1992, 327(10): 669-677.
  • 10The GUSTO Angiographic Investigators. The effects of tissue plasminogen activator, slreptokinase, or both on coronary-artery pateney, ventricular function, and survival after acute myocardial infarction[J]. N Engl J Med, 1993, 329(22): 1615-1622.

二级参考文献10

  • 1de Roos A, Matheijssen NA, Doornbos J, et al. Myocardial infarct size after reperfusion therapy: assessment with Gd-DTPA-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology,1990,176:517-521.
  • 2Weinmann HJ, Laniado M, Mutzel W. Pharmacokinetics of GdDTPA/dimeglumine after intravenous injection into healthy volunteers. Physiol Chem Phys Med NMR,1984,16:167-172.
  • 3Klein C, Nekolla SG, Bengel FM, et al. Assessment of myocardial viability with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: comparison with positron emission tomography. Circulation,2002,105:162-167.
  • 4Fieno DS, Kim RJ, Chen EL, et al. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of myocardium at risk: distinction between reversible and irreversible injury throughout infarct healing.J Am Coll Cardiol,2000,36:1985-1991.
  • 5Saeed M, Lund G, Wendland MF, et al. Magnetic resonance characterization of the peri-infarction zone of reperfused myocardial infarction with necrosis-specific and extracellular nonspecific contrast media. Circulation,2001,103:871-876.
  • 6Oshinski JN, Yang Z, Jones JR, et al. Imaging time after Gd-DTPA injection is critical in using delayed enhancement to determine infarct size accurately with magnetic resonance imaging.Circulation,2001,104:2838-2842.
  • 7Ibrahim T, Nekolla SG, Hornke M, et al. Quantitative measurement of infarct size by contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging early after acute myocardial infarction: comparison with single-photon emission tomography using Tc99m-sestamibi. J Am Coll Cardiol,2005,45:544-552.
  • 8Lund GK, Stork A, Saeed M, et al. Acute myocardial infarction: evaluation with first-pass enhancement and delayed enhancement MR imaging compared with 201Tl SPECT imaging. Radiology,2004,232:49-57.
  • 9Gerber TC, Fasseas P, Lennon RJ, et al. Clinical safety of magnetic resonance imaging early after coronary artery stent placement.J Am Coll Cardiol, 2003,42:1295-1298.
  • 10于宏伟,何涛,丁荣生,苗志敏,范洪亮,徐庆科,沃金善.血清肌钙蛋白T动态监测预测心肌梗塞面积的研究[J].中华心血管病杂志,1997,25(5):383-386. 被引量:28

共引文献8

同被引文献24

  • 1赵世华,闫朝武,杨敏福,陆敏杰,蒋世良,李世国,张岩,刘琼,刘玉清,何作祥.磁共振心肌灌注延迟增强与核素心肌灌注/代谢显像识别存活心肌对比研究[J].中华心血管病杂志,2006,34(12):1072-1076. 被引量:26
  • 2Wang Q, Zeng Y, Wang Y, et al. Comparison of carotid arterial morphology and plaque composition between patients with acutecoronary syndrome and stable coronary artery disease: a high- resolution magnetic resonanceimaging study [ J ]. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging, 2011,27 (5) : 715-726.
  • 3Vavere AL, Arbab-Zadeh A, Rochittc CE, et al. Coronary artery stenoses: accuracy of 64-detector row CT angiography in segments with mild, moderate, or severe calcification-a subanalysis of the CORE-64 trial [J]. Radiology, 2011, 261 (1): 100-108.
  • 4Gerber BL. MR coronary angiography, back to the future? [J]. Cardiology, 2011, 118 (2) : 121-123.
  • 5Pilz G, Heer T, Graw M, et al. Influence of small caliber coronary arteries on the diagnostic accuracy of adenosine stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging [J]. Clin Res Cardiol, 2011, 100 (3) : 201-208.
  • 6Ge L, Kino A, Lee D, et al. Myocardial perfusion magnetic resonance imaging using sliding-window conjugate-gradient HYPR methods in canine with stenotic coronary arteries [ J ]. J Comput Assist Tomogr, 2010, 34 (5): 684-688.
  • 7Nagel E. Magnetic resonance coronary angiography: the condemned live longer [J]. J Am Coil Cardiol, 2010, 56 (12) : 992-994.
  • 8Kato S, Kitagawa K, Ishida N, et al. Assessment of coronary artery disease using magnetic resonance coronary angiography: a national multicenter trial [J]. J Am Coil Cardiol, 2010, 56 (12): 983- 991.
  • 9Clemente A, Del Borrello M, Greco P, et al. Anomalous origin of the coronary arteries in children: diagnostic role of three- dimensional coronary MR angiography [ J]. Ciin Imaging, 2010, 34 (5) : 337-343.
  • 10Ko SM, Choi JW, Song MG, et al. Myocardial perfusion imaging using adenosine-induced stress dual-energy computed tomography of the heart: comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and conventional coronary angiography [ J]. Eur Radiol, 2011,21 ( I ) : 26-35.

引证文献2

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部