在日常生活中把“章”拆成“立早”并非错误——与《是“音十”而非“立早”》的作者商榷

It is No Mistake to Deconstruct the Chinese Character "章" into "立早" in Our Every Day Life——An Academic Discussion with the Author of the article It should be "音十" but not "立早"

张凯在《是"音十"而非"立早"》一文中,对人们在日常生活中将"章"字拆分为"立早"提出批评,认为这种说法是错误的,有悖于造字原理。这从造字的角度来说当然是对的。但汉字的拆分,还有一个功能,那就是修辞。在汉字修辞中,人们为了表达的需要,可以不拘"六书"法则。将章拆分为"立早"虽然不合"六书"的要求,却正好体现了汉字修辞在汉字形体利用上的特点,因而并非错误。

In his article It should be “音十” but not “立早” ,Zhang Kai criticizes that it is not correct to deconstruct the Chinese Character “章” into “立早” because it is against the laws of character-forming roles in Chinese language. From the perspective of character-forming in Chinese language, his view is correct. However, the deconstruction of Chinese character has another function, that is rhetoric function. In Chinese rhetoric, for the need of expression, people may not have to follow the ＂six golden roles of character-forming＇.＇. To deconstruct “章” into “立早” , though does not go with the ＂six golden roles＂, it actually embodies the function of Chinese rhetoric in its flexible application of the form features of Chinese characters , and thus it is no mistake at all.