期刊文献+

不同血细胞检测系统血常规测定结果的可比性分析 被引量:17

Comparative study on result of blood cells with different hematological analyzers
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:通过不同检测系统对血常规测定结果进行方法比对,探讨不同血细胞分析系统对同一标本其测定结果的可比性。方法:按照NCCLS的EP9-A2文件要求,以Sysm ex XE-2100血细胞分析仪为目标检测系统(对比方法),Sys-m ex KX-21、CD-1700、BC-3000为实验检测系统(实验方法)。用病人新鲜全血对WBC、RBC、HGB、PLT进行检测,计算相关系数和回归方程,以美国临床试验室修正法规(CLIA,88)规定的室间质量评价允许误差范围的1/2为标准,判断不同检测系统测定结果的可比性。结果:除检测系统1(Sysm ex KX-21血细胞分析仪)的PLT低值测定结果、检测系统2(雅培CD-1700血细胞分析仪)的WBC低值的测定结果外,其余项目在不同检测系统上的测定结果在比较范围与检测系统4(Sysm ex XE-2100血细胞分析仪)均具有可比性。结论:应定期对不同血细胞检测系统进行测定结果的可比性分析,以及时发现系统误差,并进行校准,以确保检验结果的准确可靠。 Objective:To investigate comparability of blood cells results with different hematological analyzers.Methods:Following NCCLS document EP9-A2,detectings system 4(comparison method,Sysmex XE-2100)and detecting system1-3(laboratory method,Sysmex KX-21,CD-1700,BC-3000) were used to detect 4 items including WBC,RBC,HGB,PLT and to obtain the correlation coefficient and the linear equation.Evaluate the system bias between laboratory method and comparison method according to the half of CLLA.Results:ALL results could be accepted except the bias of PLT of system 1 and WBC of system 2 at lower value.Conclusion:It is necessary to do method comparison to judge clinical acceptability with different hematological analyzers.
出处 《中国卫生检验杂志》 CAS 2008年第12期2661-2662,共2页 Chinese Journal of Health Laboratory Technology
关键词 血细胞分析仪 对比研究 相对偏差 Hematology analyzer Comparative study Relative bias
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献8

  • 1[1]International Committee for Standardization in Hematology;Expert p anel on cytometry.Reference method for the enumeration of erythrocytes and leuk ocytes[J]. Clin Lab Heamat,1994,16∶131-138.
  • 2[2]International Committee for Standardization in Hematology;Expert panel o n hemoglobinometry.Recommendations for reference method for hemoglobinometry in human blood(ICSH standard 1986)and specifications for international hemoglobincy anide reference preparation 3rd[J].Clin Lab Haematol,1987,9∶73-79.
  • 3[3]NCCLS.Precedure for Determining Packed Cell Volume by the Microhematioc r it Method-Second Edition;Approved Standard[S].NCCLS Document H7-A2, Vol.1 3 No 9,1993,13(9).
  • 4International Organization for Standardization.General Requirements for the Competence of Testing and Calibration Laboratories.ISO/IEC 17025,International Organization for Standardization,Geneva,1999.
  • 5The National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards.Method Comparison and Bias Estimation Using Patient Samples.Approved Guideline,Second Edition,EP9-A2,2002.
  • 6Siekmann L,Bonora R,Burtis CA,et al.IFCC primary reference procedures for the measurement of catalytic activity concentrations of enzymes at 37 degrees C.International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine.Part 7.Certification of four reference materials for the determination of enzymatic activity of gamma-glutamyltransferase,lactate dehydrogenase,alanine aminotransferase and creatine kinase accord.Clin Chem Lab Med,2002,40:739-745.
  • 7郭健,王清涛,童清,杨振华.血清酶测定标准化的实验研究[J].中华检验医学杂志,2002,25(3):147-149. 被引量:42
  • 8王清涛,童清,郭健.血清酶测定结果可溯源性研究[J].中华检验医学杂志,2003,26(12):761-763. 被引量:23

共引文献168

同被引文献106

引证文献17

二级引证文献60

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部