摘要
目的观察临床护理路径在子宫颈癌围手术期护理中的应用效果。方法将60例子宫颈癌患者随机分为观察组和对照组各30例，观察组采用临床护理路径进行护理，对照组按常规护理，比较两组焦虑情绪发生率及术后卧床时间、住院时间、住院天数及患者满意度。结果观察组焦虑自评量表（SAS）评分，干预后（36．58±6．50）分，明显低于干预前（42．73±5．42）分（t=2．813，P〈0．05）；抑郁自评量表（SDS）评分，干预后（0．46±0．06）分，明显低于干预前（0．51±0．07）分（t=2．358，P〈0．05）；观察组卧床时间（50．5±10．3）h、住院天数（11．5±2．3）d、满意度（96．8±3．2）％与对照组[（58．2±12．9）h、（14．2±2．6）d、（86．5±7．5）％]比较，差异均有统计学意义（t=2．312，t=2．411，t=2．489，均P〈0．05）。结论临床护理路径应用于子宫颈癌患者围手术期护理，可有效提高护理质量及患者满意度。
Objective To explore the pathway of clinical nursing care to perioperative nursing care in the treatment of cancer of cervix. Methods 60 patients with cancer of cervix were randomly divided into experiment group （ n = 30） and control group （ n = 30 ）. Patients were given nursing care in the light of pathway of clinical nursing care in the experiment group while routine nursing care was given in the control group,the occurrence of anxiety,the duration in bed, duration of hsopitalization and satisfaction of patients were compared. Results The score of anxiety rating scale （ SAS）, after the intervention （ 36. 58±6. 50 ） points, significantly lower than before the intervention （42.73 ±5.42 ） points （ t = 2. 813, P 〈 0. 05 ） ; the socre of self-rating depression scale （ SDS ）, after the intervention （ 0. 46 ± 0. 06 ） points, significantly lower than before the intervention （ 0. 51 ± 0. 07 ） points （ t = 2. 358, P 〈 0. 05 ） ; bed time of the experimental group （ 50. 5 ± 10. 3 ） h, the number of hospitalization days （ 11. 5± 2. 3 ） d, satisfaction （96. 8 ± 3.2 ） % were lower than the control group [ 58.2 ± 12. 9） h, （ 14. 2 ± 2. 6 ） d, （ 86.5 ± 7. 5 ） %, t = 2. 312, t = 2. 411,t = 2. 489,P 〈 0. 05 ]. Conclusion It is effective to apply the pathway of clinical nursing care for pefioperative nursing care to increase quality of nursing care and satisfaction of patients in the treatment of cancer of cervix.
出处
《中国基层医药》
CAS
2008年第11期1811-1813,共3页
Chinese Journal of Primary Medicine and Pharmacy
