期刊文献+

社会支持程度对医科大学生自我效能感、考试焦虑及解剖学习成绩的影响 被引量:2

The Influence of Different Levels of Social Supports on Feeling of Self-efficiency,Test Anxiety and Performance of Anatomy in Medical Students
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨不同社会支持程度对医科大学生自我效能感、考试焦虑及解剖学习成绩的影响。方法对226名医科大学生进行社会支持量表、一般自我效能感量表、Sarason考试焦虑量表的测评。以社会支持评分为分组依据,社会支持总分<35分为低社会支持组(低分组),>45分为高社会支持组(高分组),进行各量表得分及解剖学习成绩的比较。结果社会支持高分组医科大学生GSES评分([29.67±6.57)分]及解剖学习成绩([78.56±15.74)分],显著高于低分组([20.47±4.21)分;(67.71±13.92)分];而TAS评分则显著低于低分组,差异有显著性(P<0.01)。社会支持高分组医科大学生自我效能感好者显著多于低分组,而自我效能感差者则显著少于低分组;高、中、低度焦虑的发生率两者也有显著性差异;社会支持高分组医科大学生解剖成绩优秀率显著高于低分组,差异有显著性(P<0.05或P<0.01)。相关分析显示,社会支持总分及各因子评分与GSES评分、解剖成绩呈显著正相关,而与TAS评分呈显著负相关(P<0.05或P<0.01)。结论医科大学生社会支持程度高者,其自我效能感、解剖学习成绩较高,而考试焦虑程度较低,应采取措施提高医科大学生社会支持程度。 Objective To explore the influence of social support on feeling of self-efficiency, test-anxiety and performance of anatomy in medical students. Methods 226 medical students were detected by social support rating scale (SSRS), general self-effciency scale(GSES), Sarasons'test anxiety scale(TAS), the subjects were divided into two groups according to the scores of Social support,the subjects who scored less than 35 were divided into low social support group (low score group), and who socred more than 45 were divided into high social support group(high score group),compare the scores of scales and the performances of anatomy. Results The score of GSES(29.67 ± 6.57) and the performances of anatomy(78.56±15.74) in high social support group was significantly higher than that of low score group(20.47± 4.21,67.71±13.92);but the score of TAS was lower than that of low score group,the difference between the two groups was significant(P 〈 0.01 ). Compared with low score group,there were more students of good self-efficiency in high social support group; there was also a significant difference between the two groups in the incidence rate of high, medium and low levels of anxiety; the performance of anatomy in high social support group was much higher than that of in low score group,the difference between the two group was significant(P 〈 0.05 or P 〈 0.01 ). Correlated analysis study indicate that,there was a positive correlation between total score of social support, score of each factor and score of GESE,performance of anatomy; but there was a negative correlation with score of TAS(P 〈 0.05 or P 〈 0.01 ). Conclusion. Medical students who with high social support have good feelings of serf-efficiency and get high scores in anatomy, and with low levels of anxiety, so measures must be took to improve the social support of medical students.
出处 《中国现代医生》 2009年第1期17-19,共3页 China Modern Doctor
关键词 大学生 医科 社会支持 自我效能感 考试焦虑 Student Medical Social support Feeling of self-efficiency Test anxiety
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献29

  • 1叶仁敏,Tom Rocklin.测验焦虑的跨文化研究[J].心理科学通讯,1988,11(3):27-31. 被引量:44
  • 2凌文辁.用TAI量表对中国大学生考试焦虑的测量与分析[J].心理学报,1985,17(2):137-143. 被引量:48
  • 3林榕发.大学生焦虑心理及其对策[J].南平师专学报,2005,24(2):100-103. 被引量:15
  • 4赵玮琳,陶建青,黄玲,业明.学生考试焦虑与人格特征的相关性研究[J].中国校医,2006,20(2):163-164. 被引量:7
  • 5汪向东.心理卫生评定量表手册[J].中国心理卫生杂志,1993,:202-209.
  • 6郑晓华 舒良 等.状态-特质焦虑问卷在长春的测试报告[J].中国心理卫生杂志,1993,7(2):60-62.
  • 7王征宇.症状自评量表(SCL-90).上海精神医学,1984,2(2):68-70.
  • 8[5]Thoits P A.Dimensions of life events that influence psychological distress:an evaluation and synthesis of the literatur[M]// Kaplan H.er.Psychological Stress,1st ed.New York:Acdemic Press,1983:33-103.
  • 9Spielberger C D. Vagg, Test anxiety : Theory, assessment, and treatment , Washington, D. C :Taylor & Francis, 1995, pp. 3 - 14.
  • 10Elliot A J, McGregor H A. Test Anxiety and the hierarchical model of approach and avoidanee achievement motivation, Journal of Personality and Social Psyehology, 1999a, Vol.76,No.4,628- 644.

共引文献627

同被引文献17

引证文献2

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部