期刊文献+

社会科学背景下因果推论的统计方法 被引量:12

Statistical Methods of Causal Effects in Social Sciences
下载PDF
导出
摘要 如何根据非随机数据估计变量间的因果关系是社会科学研究中一个迫切的方法论问题。上世纪70年代,Rubin等人指出因果问题本质上是一个反事实的问题,认为某些统计方法可保证混淆变量和分组安排独立,并将这种方法推广到观察数据的分析中。倾向分数、工具变量和回归间断点是三种常用的方法,其中倾向分数居核心地位。以实际数据为例建立计算倾向分数的logistic模型,报告了模型的整体检验、预测变量的显著性检验和多重共线性检验、建立匹配组和分析结果报告。 People before stuck to the apparent relation between objects to infer the causal effects. After applying the manipulation and control means to research, they have made great progress but also faced more difficulties. In 1970s, Rubin pointed out that the nature of the causal effects is the issue of counter fact and that some statistical methods used to guarantee the confounding variables is independent from subject assignment. Now, these methods are extensively used to analyze the observable data. The present paper introduces three statistical methods for causal effects inference and explains how to apply the propensity score to data analysis.
作者 辛涛 李峰
出处 《北京师范大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第1期47-51,共5页 Journal of Beijing Normal University(Social Sciences)
关键词 因果推论 观测数据 倾向分数 工具变量 回归间断点 causal effects observation data propensity score instrumental variable regression discontinuity
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1北京大学哲学系选编.西方哲学原著选读(上卷)[M].北京:商务印书馆,1981.
  • 2HUGH G G,J.科学方法实践[M].王义豹译.北京:清华大学出版社,2004.
  • 3HOLLAND P W. Statistics and causal inference [J]. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1986, (81) : 945-970.
  • 4RAUDENBUSH S W. Learning from attempts to improve schooling: The contribution of methodological diversity [J]. Educational Research,2005,34(5) :25-31.
  • 5RUBIN D B. Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies [J]. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1974, (66) : 688-701.
  • 6MANSKI C F. Identification Problems in the Social Sciences[C]. P V, Marsden. Sociological Methodology. Oxford : Blackwell Publisher, 1993.
  • 7MANSKI C C, NAGIN D S. Bounding disagreements about treatment effects: a case study of sentencing and recidivism[M]. Adrian E. Raftery. Sociological Methodology. Mass. : Blaekwell Publishers,1998.
  • 8HECKMAN J J, HOTZ V J J. Choosing among alternative non- experimental methods for estimating the impact of social programs:the case of manpower training (with discussion. )[J]. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1989, (84): 862-880.
  • 9Rosenbaum P R. Rubin D B. The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects [J]. Biometrika, 1983,70 (1) : 41 - 55.
  • 10BARBARA S, MARTIN C, JEREMY K, etl. Estimating causal effects using experimental and observational designs [Z]. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association, 2007.

共引文献2

同被引文献304

引证文献12

二级引证文献123

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部