中学生的学业行为及其与人格、师生关系的相关被引量：16

Relationships of Personality,Learning Behaviors,and Teacher-Student Relationships in Secondary School Students

下载PDF

导出

摘要以北京和西安两所城市四所中学初一、初二、高一、高二年级1592名中学生为被试,采用学业行为问卷、人格五因素问卷和师生关系问卷,考察中学生学业行为的特点,并探讨人格、师生关系对学业行为的影响。结果发现:(1)中学生学业行为具有显著的性别和年级差异。(2)中学生的师生关系可以划分为亲密型、一般型和冲突型,师生关系不同类型的个体在学业行为各维度差异显著。(3)学业行为与人格五因素、师生关系各维度具有显著的相关。(4)人格五因素和师生关系的亲密性、冲突性能够显著预测学业行为,谨慎性在师生关系的亲密性和学业行为间起完全中介作用。 The research investigates the characters of learning behaviors of students in secondary school students in Beijing and Xi＇an, and its relations to their personality and teacher--student relationship. There were 1592 students who completed the learning behaviors questionnaire, the five--factor personality inventory,and the teacher--student relationship inventory. The results show that （1） secondary students＇ learning behaviors display significant gender and grade difference; （ 2 ） three distinctive types of teacher--student relationship are identified： intimacy type, conflict type,and average type, and significant differences exist between them on learning behaviors; {3} students＇ learning behaviors have significant relation to all dimensions of personality and teacher--student relationship; {4} the five--factor personality, the intimacy,and the conflict of the teacher--student relationship could significantly predicate the learning behaviors; the conscientiousness functions as the mediator between the teacher--student relationship intimacy and learning behaviors.

作者邹泓李彩娜

机构地区北京师范大学发展心理研究所陕西师范大学教育科学学院

出处《北京师范大学学报（社会科学版）》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第1期52-59,共8页 Journal of Beijing Normal University(Social Sciences)

基金教育部人文社科重点研究基地重大项目"青少年社会适应的保护性因素与危险性因素的评估"(05JJDXLX001)

关键词学业行为人格五因素师生关系中学生 learning behaviors five-- factor personality teacher-- student relationships secondary school students

分类号 G44 [哲学宗教—发展与教育心理学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献34

1MCDERMOTT P A. National scales of differential learning behaviors among american children and adolescents[J]. School Psychology Review, 1999,28 ( 2 ) : 280-291.
2COOLAHAN K, FANTUZZO J, MENDEZ J. Preschool peer interactions and readiness to learn: relationships between classroom peer play and learning behaviors and conduct [J]. Journal of Educational Psychology, 2000,92(3): 458-465.
3MCDERMOTT P A, MORDELL M. The organization of student performance in American schools:discipline, motivation, verbal learning, and nonverbal learning [J]. Journal of Educational Psychology,2001,93(1) :65 -76.
4PERRY F J, MCDERMOTT P A . Preschool approaches to learning and their relationship to other relevant classroom competencies for low-income children[J]. School Psychology Quarterly, 2004,19(3) : 212 - 230.
5SCHAEFER B A, MCDERMOTT P A . Learning behavior and intelligence as explanations for children's scholastic achievement [J]. Journal of School Psychology, 1999,37(3) :299-313.
6MCDERMOTT P A, GREEN L F, FRANCIS J M, STOTT D H. Learning Behaviors Scale[M]. Philadelphia: Edumetric and Clinical Science, 1999.
7BUCHANAN H H, MCDERMOTT P A, SCHAEFER B A. Agreement among classroom observers of children's stylistic learning behaviors[J]. Psychology in the Schools,1998,35(4) :355-361.
8高笑,陈红.“大五”人格模型与工作绩效关系的研究进展[J].人类工效学,2007,13(3):67-69. 被引量：9
9刘玉凡 q=-平.大五人格与职务绩效的关系[J].心理学动态,2000,8(3):73-80.
10MARTOCCHIO J J. JUDGE T A, Relationship between conscientiousness and learning in employee training: mediating influences of self-deception and self- efficacy [J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1997, 82(5) :764-773.