期刊文献+

自控镇痛泵健康教育指导标准的设计与探讨 被引量:7

The design and explore of health education standard to PCA patients
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:构建使用自控镇痛泵病人护理健康教育指导标准,并对其合理性及可操作性进行探讨。方法:根据使用自控镇痛泵病人健康教育的需求,参照美国ISO9000质量管理体系的框架,分5个步骤构建自控镇痛泵病人术前、术后健康教育指导标准;并对某省2个地区的438名外科护理人员进行问卷调查,测量护理人员对此标准的认同情况。结果:98%的护士认为此标准内容完整,对临床有指导作用;97%的护士认为此标准实用性和可操作性强;96%的护士认为该标准能有效地控制健康教育质量。结论:本指导标准对健康教育的临床指导、质量管理、目标控制具有重要的积极作用,提高了使用自控镇痛泵病人的满意度。 Objective: This study aimed to build the standard of health education to the patients with PCA pump and explore its rationality and practicability. Methods: According to the health education demands of PCA patients and the framework of ISO9000 quality control system, the health education standard for PCA patients pre-operation and post-operation was developed through 5 steps. And 438 surgical nurses in 2 regions were investigated to test the acceptability of the standard. Results: 89% of nurses thought the standard were all-sided and guided the clinical practice while 97% considered it as high rationality and practicability. And 96% of nursed thought the standard could control the health education quality effectively. Con- clusion : The standard, which is effective in the objective-based quality control, could direct the health education in the clinics and improve the satisfaction of the PCA patients.
出处 《中国护理管理》 2009年第1期60-61,共2页 Chinese Nursing Management
关键词 自控镇痛泵 护理健康教育 标准 PCA health education standard
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献27

  • 1沈曲,李峥.休斯顿疼痛情况调查表信度和效度的研究[J].中华护理杂志,2006,41(11):1049-1051. 被引量:183
  • 2Dihle A, Helseth S, Kongsgaard UE, et al. Using the American Pain Society's Patient Outcome Questionnaire to evaluate the quality of postoperative pain management in a sample of Norwegian patients [J]. The Journal of Pain, 2006, 7(4): 272-280.
  • 3McNeill JA, Sherwood GD, Starck PL, et al. Assessing clinical outcomes: Patient satisfaction with pain management [J]. Journal of pain and symptom management, 1998, 16(1): 29-40.
  • 4Gordon DB, Dahl JL, Miaskowski C, et al. American pain society recommendations for improving the quality of acute and cancer pain management: American Pain Society Quality of Care Task Force [J]. Archives of Internal Medicine, 2005, 165(14): 1574-1580.
  • 5Bostrom BM, Ramberg T, Davis BD, et al. Survey of post-operative patients' pain management [J]. Journal of nursing management, 1997, 5(6): 341-9.
  • 6Miaskowski C, Nichols R, Brody R, et al. Assessment of patient satisfaction utilizing the American Pain Society's Quality Assurance Standards on acute and cancer related pain [J]. Journal of pain and symptom management, 1994, 9(1): 5-11.
  • 7Ward SE, Gordon D. Application of the American Pain Society quality assurance standards[J]. Pain, 1994, 56(3): 299-306.
  • 8Ward SE, Gordon DB. Patient satisfaction and pain severity as outcomes in pain management: A longitudinal view of one settings experience [J].Journal of pain and symptom management, 1996, 11(4): 242-51.
  • 9McNeill J, Sherwood G, Starck P, et al. Design strategies in pain management research with Hispanics [J]. Hispanic Health Care International, 2003, 2(2): 73-80.
  • 10Sherwood GD, McNeill J, Palos G, et al. Perspectives on pain: A qualitative analysis of the Hispanic pain experience [J]. NT Research,2003, 8(5): 364-377.

共引文献142

同被引文献40

引证文献7

二级引证文献35

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部