期刊文献+

情报学多学科研究之评价和超越——关于研究方法论的尝试性反思

Evaluation and Transcend of Multidisciplinary Research on the Informatics——Tentative Introspection on Study Methodology
原文传递
导出
摘要 认为目前情报学研究领域的主流范式是多学科研究视角,但多学科研究视角在保持情报学学科的学术独立性,促进学科的理论严密性,整合研究兴趣的多元性等方面存在缺陷和不足。因此,有必要通过分解情报学的研究层次,选择学科研究方法论,构建学科理论结构框架,培植特定的学科文化等方式,形成独立的情报学学科范式与完善的情报学研究的学科逻辑体系。 Multidisciplinary perspective is the prevailing paradigm of informatics research at present. But it has defects in aspects such as maintaining the academic independency of subjects in Informatics, stimulating the theoretical strictness of subjects, and integrating the pluralism of study interests. Therefore, it is necessary to develop independent subject paradigm of Informatics by stratifying its research layers, selecting methodology of subject study, constructing disciplinary theoretical frame and fostering specific disciplinary culture, so as to form independent informatics discipline paradigm and perfect discipline logical system of informatics research.
出处 《图书情报工作》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第2期47-50,共4页 Library and Information Service
关键词 情报学 多学科研究 范式 方法论 informatics multidiseiplinary research paradigm methodology
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Burton R C. Perspectives on higher education. Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1987,2.
  • 2王锦贵,王素芳.图书馆学和情报学的分野与融合发展(上)——对相关理论探讨的考察[J].情报资料工作,2007,28(5):5-12. 被引量:20
  • 3.列宁全集(第38卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1959..
  • 4迪尔凯姆.社会学研究方法论[M].北京:华夏出版社,1988.118.
  • 5Saracevic T. Relevance : A review of and a framework for the thinking on the notion of information science. Journal of American Society for Information Science, 1975, 26 (6) :321 - 343.
  • 6Saracevic T. Relevance: A review of and a framework for the thinking on the notion of information science. Advances in Librarianship, 1976, 6(6) :81 -138.
  • 7Saracevic T. Information science: origin, evolution and relations. In Vakkari, P. & Cronin, B. Conceptions of library, and information science: Historical, empirical and theoretical perspectives. Los Angeles, CA : Taylor Graham, 1992 : 132 - 1435.
  • 8Saracevic T. Relevance : A review of the literature and a framework for thinking on the notion in information science. Part Ⅱ: nature and manifestations of relevance. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2007, 58 (3) : 1915 - 1933.
  • 9Saracevic T. Relevance : A review of the literature and a framework for thinking on the notion in information science. Part Ⅲ : Behavior and effects of relevance. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2007, 58 ( 13 ) : 2126 - 2144.
  • 10Holland G A. Information science: an interdisciplinary effort? Journal of Documentation, 2008, 64 ( 1 ) :7 - 23.

二级参考文献92

共引文献98

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部