期刊文献+

流域决策的不确定性分析 被引量:3

Uncertainty analysis for decision-making in river basin management
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对流域决策中的不确定因素容易对流域工程或非工程措施的排序产生影响的问题,采用蒙特卡罗法中的拉丁超立方体抽样方法,根据流域决策中的各个不确定因素,并侧重数学模型不确定性对工程或非工程措施排序的影响,对马斯河5种可能措施下的风险模型进行分析,根据各个措施下净现值的均值和标准差,得出各措施的排序.从不确定性分析结果可以看出,模型的不确定性对流域决策的影响是非常大的,通常会令决策人员在不确定的情况下遭遇排序的困难.对流域的决策进行不确定分析,可增强决策的可靠性. Uncertainty in river basin management have impacts on the ranking of river structural or non structural measures. Latin hypercuhe sampling of Monte Carlo method was used to propagate different un certainty sources into decision-making with focus on mathematical model uncertainty. Five potential measures were used and the impacts of various uncertainty sources on the ranking of the measures for the Meuse River in the Netherlands were investigated according to the mean value and standard deviation of net present value under different measures. Results show that the impacts are significant and decision makers will experience difficulty in ranking under uncertainty. Uncertainty analysis for decision-making in river basin management can provide more reliable scientific support.
出处 《浙江大学学报(工学版)》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2009年第1期188-192,共5页 Journal of Zhejiang University:Engineering Science
基金 荷兰皇家科学院科技资助项目(02CDP036)
关键词 流域管理 流域决策 不确定分析 洪水风险模型 river basin management river basin decision making uncertainty analysis flood risk model
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1MOWRER H. Uncertainty in natural resource decision support systems: sources, interpretation, and importance [J]. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2000(27):139 - 154.
  • 2European Commission. Communication on the precautionary principle[R]. Europe: Commission of the European Communications, 2000.
  • 3陈守煜.模糊水文学[J].大连理工大学学报,1988,28(1):93-97.
  • 4张继国,刘新仁.水文水资源中不确定性的信息熵分析方法综述[J].河海大学学报(自然科学版),2000,28(6):32-37. 被引量:22
  • 5孙秀玲,霍太英,褚君达.水环境容量的不确定性分析计算[J].人民黄河,2005,27(3):34-36. 被引量:5
  • 6张洪刚,郭生练,何新林,李超群.水文预报不确定性的研究进展与展望[J].石河子大学学报(自然科学版),2006,24(1):15-21. 被引量:25
  • 7WALKER W E, HARREMOES P, ROTMANS J, et al. Defining uncertainty, a conceptual basis for uncertainty management in model-based decision support[J].Integrated Assessment, 2003, 4 (1):5 - 17.
  • 8SALTELLI A, CHAN K, SCOTT E M. Sensitivity analysis[M]. England: Wiley , 2000.
  • 9YU P S, YANG T, CHEN S. Comparison of uncertainty analysis methods for a distributed rainfall-runoff model [J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2001,244(1-2):43 - 59.
  • 10LOAGUE K M, FREEZE R A. A comparison of rainfall-runoff modelling techniques on small upland catchments [J].Water Resources Research, 1985, 21 (2): 229 - 248.

二级参考文献57

共引文献57

同被引文献41

引证文献3

二级引证文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部