期刊文献+

后方法理论背景下的交际法反思与大学英语教学原则探讨 被引量:4

Reflection of CLT and discussion of CET principles in context postmethod theory
下载PDF
导出
摘要 从历史上看,外语教学研究主要是教学方法的研究,忽视了具体使用教学方法的人(包括教师与学生)和具体情境。通过对后方法的评述,文章客观地评价和分析了交际语言教学法于大学英语教学中的优势与缺陷,并以后方法理论为依据,批判了以方法为中心的教学法,提出了后方法时代大学英语教学指导原则。 In the history, research of foreign language teaching mainly included the study of teaching methods, which ignored the people (teachers and students) using the methods and the context. Postmethod theory criticizes the method-oriented teaching methods and offers a new perspective to the reform of CET. Through the review of postmethod theory, the paper evaluates and analyzes objectively the strength and weekness of CLT applied in CET, and scientifically proposes CET principles in postmethod era.
作者 谢贤春
出处 《教学研究》 2009年第1期60-63,共4页 Research in Teaching
关键词 后方法 交际语言教学法 具体情境 大学英语教学 postmethod, CLT, context, CET.
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献33

  • 1Anthony,E.M.Approach,Method,and Technique[J].English Language Teaching,1963(17-2):63-67.
  • 2Brown,H.D.English Language Teaching in the “Post-Methods” Era:Toward Better Diagnosis,Treatment,and Assessment[A].In J.C.Richards & W.A.Renandya(eds.)Methodology in Language Teaching[C].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2002.
  • 3Nunan,D.Language Teaching Methodology:A Textbook for Teachers[M].New York:Prentice-Hall,1991.
  • 4Oxford,R.L.Language Learning Strategies in a Nutshell:Update and ESL Suggestions[A].In J.C.Richards & W.A.Renandya(eds.)Methodology in Language Teaching[C].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2002.
  • 5Prabu,N.S.There Is No Best Method-Why?[J].TESOL Quarterly,1990(24):161-176.
  • 6Richards,J.C.& Rodgers.T.S.Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1986.
  • 7Richards,J.C.Theories of Teaching in Language Teaching[A].In J.C.Richards & W.A.Renandya(eds.)Methodology in Language Teaching[C].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2002.
  • 8Stern,H.H.Review of Methods That Work:A Smorgasbord of Ideas for Language Teachers[J].Studies in Second Language Acquisition,1985(7):249-251.
  • 9Anthony, E. 1963 Approach, method and technique. English Language Teaching 17: 63-67.
  • 10Bell, D. 2003 Method and Postmethod: Are They Really So Incompatible? TESOL Quarterly,37(2), 325-336.

共引文献200

同被引文献25

  • 1周世范.《大学英语教学策略新论》序[J].外语教学,2005,26(1):21-21. 被引量:4
  • 2成晓光.后方法时代的外语教学法研究[J].天津外国语学院学报,2006,13(4):63-68. 被引量:91
  • 3Brown, H. D. English language teaching in the "Post Methods" Era : Toward better diagnosis , treatment ,and assessment[A]. In J. C. Richards & W. A. Renandya(eds.) Methodology in Language Teaching [C]. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press ,2002 : 9-18.
  • 4Richards J. & Rodgers T. Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching[M]. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2001:244-255.
  • 5Kumaravadivelu, B. Method, antimethod, postmethod [A]. In A. Pulvemess(ed.).IATEFL York Conference Selections. Whitstable, Kent: International Association of Teachers of English as a Foreign Language[C].2002:11-19.
  • 6Bax, S. The end ofCLT: a context approach to language teaching.ELT Journal [J], 2003(3): 278 - 287.
  • 7Kumaravadivelu, B. Understanding Language Teaching : From Method to Postmethod Mahwah[M].New Jersey, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 2006 : 170-173.
  • 8中华人民共和国.2008年国民经济和社会发展统计公报[EB/OL].http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjgb/ndtjgb/qgndtjgb/t20090226_402540710.htm(2009-2-6)[2009-5-9]中华人民共和国国家统计局.
  • 9CNKI中国知网.[EB/OL].http://dlib.edu.cnki.net/kns50/scdbsearch/cdbindex.aspx[2009-5-9].
  • 10Kumaravadivelu, B. A postmethod perspective on English language teaching. WorldEnglishes[J], Vol. 22, No.4, pp. 539-550, 2003.

引证文献4

二级引证文献23

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部