期刊文献+

现实与理想的张力——基于考试与素质发展关系的中小学考试思路构建

The Tension between Reality and Ideal——Examination Construction in the Primary and Middle Schools According to the Relation between Examination and Quality Development
下载PDF
导出
摘要 我国中小学考试正处于相当混乱的状况,其原因之一是较长时间以来关于考试与素质发展的关系存在着以下认识误区:不恰当地套用二元对立的思维方式;对考试与素质发展之性质的误解;将局部当作整体;片面地或过高地看待考试的功能。考试与素质发展既有着重要的实质性联系,又有着重要区分,它们之间的关系可概括为局部现实与完满理想的张力关系。基于这种张力关系的考试体系构建的基本思路包括:确立全景发展的理想;充分考虑考试体系构建的有效性;关注和把握考试的局限性。 Examinations in the primary and middle schools in our country are in a chaos, one reason for which is that there have been some misunderstandings about the relationship between examinations and quality development which include:improper use of the binary opposition thinking mode; misunderstanding about the nature of examinations and quality development; taking the part for the whole; and having an exaggerated or unilateral opinion of the function of examinations. There are both substantial links and big differences between examinations and quality development, and their relationship can be summarized as the tension between partial reality and satisfactory ideal. The fundamental thinking about the examination system construction based on this tension includes: to establish an ideal of panoramic development; to take into full consideration the validity of the examination system construction; to pay attention to and grasp the limitations of examination.
作者 丁念金
出处 《教育理论与实践》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第2期20-23,共4页 Theory and Practice of Education
关键词 中小学 考试 素质发展 张力 基本思路 primary and middle schools examination quality development tension fundamental thinking
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

  • 1[美]约翰·杜威.经验与自然[M].傅统先译.北京:商务印书馆,1960.
  • 2丁念金,韩靖.面向校本课程决策的教师专业发展[J].湖南师范大学教育科学学报,2005,4(6):45-48. 被引量:3
  • 3Solomon, Pearl G.The Curriculum Bddge: From Standa-rds to Actual Classroom Practice[M].Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press, Inc, 2003.129-130.

二级参考文献7

  • 1M. Frances Klein. The Politics of Curriculum Decision-Making [M].Albany: State University of New York Press, 1991.
  • 2Colin Marsh et al.. Reconceptualizing School-based Curriculum Development[ M]. London: The Falmer Press, 1990.
  • 3[美]B.S.布卢姆.教育目标分类学(罗黎辉等译)[M].上海:华东师范大学出版社,1986.
  • 4Lee S. Shulman, Judith H. Shulman. Howand What Teachers Learn: A Shifting Perspective[J]. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 2004, (2) :259-262.
  • 5J. John Loughran. Effective Reflective Practice in Search of Meaning in Learning about Teaching[ J]. Journal of Teacher Education, 2002, (1) :35-36.
  • 6Brian Hudson. Holding Complexity and Searching for Learning:Teaching as Reflective Practice[J] .Journal of Curriculum Studies,2002, (1) :43-54.
  • 7James McKeman. Curriculum Action Research [ M ]. London:Kogan Page Limited, 1996.

共引文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部