期刊文献+

美国高校录取中的非学术因素 被引量:2

Non-academic Factors in the US College Admission
下载PDF
导出
摘要 美国高校在录取新生时非常看重学业成绩等学术因素,但也关注且近年来日益强调学生的个性特征等非学术品质。这主要是由于美国的两项重要研究,即个性特征等非学术品质与大学学业成功关系密切。另外,美国高校日益强调多样性、国际化等办学理念,这也对高校录取工作产生了重要影响。近年来,对处境不利背景学生以及挑战不利处境的能力等品质的日益关注,使高校在录取时对学生的家庭背景、社会经济背景等非学术因素也日益重视起来。美国高校录取工作中关于非学术因素的地位、价值与使用方面的研究与实践,值得我们关注、深入研究与有选择地借鉴。 Besides academic factors, non-academic factors are also becoming very important in the US college admission. This is due to the two important researches showing the close connection between personal qualities and academic success in colleges. Still, more and more emphasis on diversity and internationalization also has had great influence on college admission. In recent years, people pay more and more attention to the disadvantaged students and their potential in challenging which also promote colleges to think highly of applicants' family background and socio- economic background. Researches on the position, value and application of nonacademic factors and their practice in the US college admission deserve our attention, deep research and borrowing.
作者 任长松
出处 《教育理论与实践》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第2期24-29,共6页 Theory and Practice of Education
关键词 高校录取 学术因素 非学术因素 个性特征 college admission academic factors non-academic factors personal qualities
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Gretchen W. Rigol (2003). Admissions Decision-MakingModels: How U.S. Institutions of Higher Education Select Undergraduate Students. New York, NY: College Entrance Examination Board. PpA9- 20.
  • 2Breland, H, Maxey J., Gernand, R, Cumming, T. & Trapani, C.(2002). Trends in College Admission 2000: A Report of a National Survey of Undergraduate Admission Policies, Practices, and Procedures. P.71.
  • 3Willingham, W.W. & Breland, H.(1982). Personal Qualities and College Admissions. New York, NY: College Entrance Examination Board.Willingham, W.W.(1985). Success in College: The Role of Personal Qualities and Academic Ability. New York, NY: College Entrance Examination Board.
  • 4College Board(1999). Toward a Taxonomy of the Admissions Decision-Making Process: A Public Document Based on the First and Second College Board Conferences on Admissions Models. New York, NY: College Entrance Examination Board. Pp.12-13. P.16.
  • 5Gretchen W. Rigol (2003). Admissions Decision-MakingModels: How U.S. Institutions of Higher Education Select Undergraduate Students. New York, NY: College Entrance Examination Board.
  • 6Amy Elizabeth Schmidt & Wayne J. Camara."Group Differences in Standardized Test Scores and Other Educaitonal Indicators." In: Rebecca Zwick(2004). Rethinking the SAT: The Future of Standardized Testing in University Admissions. New York and London: Routledge Farmer.
  • 7Julie Noble."The Effects of Using ACT Composite Scores and High Scholl Averages on College Admissions Decisions for Ethnic Groups." In: Rebecca Zwick(2004). Rethinking the SAT: The Future of Standardized Testing in University Admissions. New York and London: Routledge Farmer.
  • 8Rebecca Zwick:"Is the SAT a'Wealth Test' ? The Link between Educational Achievement and Socioeconomic Status."In: Rebecca Zwick(2004). Rethinking the SAT: The Future of Standardized Testing in University Admissions. New York and London: Routledge Farmer. Pp.203-204.
  • 9College Board (2002). Best Practices in Admissions Decisions: A Report on the Third College Board Conference on Admissions Models. New York, NY: College Entrance Examination Board. P.27.
  • 10Christian Perez. Reassessing College Admissions: Examining Tests and Admitting Alternatives. In: Rebecca Zwick (2004). Rethinking the SAT: The Future of Standardized Testing in University Admissions. New York and London: Routledge Farmer. Pp.350-351.

同被引文献16

  • 1聂海峰.填报高考志愿哪种方式对考生有利?[J].南方经济,2006,35(6):75-89. 被引量:23
  • 2胡乐乐.美国高校招生录取制度最新改革综述[J].比较教育研究,2007,28(5):23-26. 被引量:2
  • 3郑若玲.我们能从美国高校招生制度借鉴什么[J].东南学术,2007(3):156-160. 被引量:27
  • 4GretchenW. Rigol( 2003 ).Admissions Decision-MakingModels:How U.S. Institutions of Higher Education Select UndergraduateStudents. New York, NY: College Entrance Examination Board.Pp.19-20.
  • 5The National Association for College Admission Counseling. State of College Admission,2007. http://www.naeaenet.org/seareheenter/ pages/results.aspx?k=state%20of%20eollege%20admission.2010-6-10.
  • 6Brent Bridgeman, et al., Predictions of Freshman Grade-Point Average From the Revised and SAT I :Reasoning Test. http:// professionals.collegeboard.com/data -reports -research/cb/predietions - fgpa-revi sed-sati, 2000-1 - 1/2009-5 - 1:5.
  • 7College Admissions Information for Some of the Most Elite U.S. Universities. [EB/OL].http://collegeapps.about.com/od/choosingacollege/ tp/ivy-league-schools.html.2010-6-17.
  • 8College Navigator. http://www.nces.ed.gov/eollegenavigatorl 2010-6-17.
  • 9National center for Educational statistics (NCES). Digest of Education Statistics 2008:Table187. Historical summary of faculty, students,degrees,and finances in degree-granting institutions. [EB/ OL]. http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=20100603:P27.
  • 10Ancheta Angelo,Revisiting Bakke and Diversity - Based Admissions: Constitutional Law, Social Science Research, and the University of Michigan Affirmative Action Cases. Briefing Paper [R]. Cambridge, MA: The Civil Rights Project at Harvard University, 2003.2- 3.

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部