平衡道德的动机与效果

Motivation and results of banlanced morals

道义论和目的论分别从不同的角度出发对道德问题进行了深入的思考,各有其合理的存在,但总体而言都仅仅是为"道德"而道德。在道德问题上最终陷入了动机和效果谁更具有优先性的思维困境,也导致了各自理论本身的逻辑与结构上的不纯洁性,因而悬置动机与效果的二元纷争,寻求二者之间的平衡就成为应然之择。

The moral and utilitarianism carried out in--depth thinking from the different points of views on morals,which have their own reasons,but overall, they are both only for ＂the moral theory of perfect＂,not only fall into the thinking trap that the motivation and effectiveness thai has more priority, but also leding to the impurity of the theoretical logic and structure,so mounting disputes of motivation and effectiveness,and seeking a balance of their own should be our rational choice.