期刊文献+

成本与需求约束下的不对称电力竞价博弈 被引量:2

Asymmetric generator bidding constrained by cost and demand
原文传递
导出
摘要 假定在双寡头电力竞价博弈中,发电厂商1与2具有不对称的策略选择方式.厂商2根据前期边际利润来调整当期的发电量,厂商1则利用厂商2在策略方面的这一信息来优化自己的策略,以使得整个考察期内的利润达到最大.利用最优控制理论来分析成本与需求约束对厂商1超额盈利能力的影响,主要结论是:如果发电厂商的边际成本上升速度快、用户的电力需求价格弹性高,那么厂商1与2在稳态时的均衡策略将趋于静态古诺模型的均衡策略,这意味着具有信息优势的厂商1并不能够使得其处于稳态时的利润明显地高于厂商2. Assume that generators 1 and 2 have asymmetric strategies in a duopolistic bidding. Generator 2 adjusts its current strategy according to marginal profit of the last period; Generator 1 selects optimal strategy so as to maximize its objective during a given time period subjected to a dynamic constraint from generator 2's strategy. This paper uses optimal control to analyze the effect of cost and demand on generator 1's excessive profit. The main result is that, if the marginal cost increases very fast and the market demand is very elastic, then equilibrium strategy in the steady state converges to the static Cournot case. This implies that, the player with dominant information cannot improve its profit significantly.
作者 张荣 黄学祥
出处 《系统工程理论与实践》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2009年第1期37-43,共7页 Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice
基金 国家自然科学基金(70771118) 教育部留学回国人员科研启动基金
关键词 电力市场 动态博弈 需求弹性 边际成本 最优控制 electricity market dynamic game elasticity of demand marginal cost optimal control
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Liu Y F, Wu F F. Generator bidding in oligopolistic electricity markets using optimal control: Fundamentals and application[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2006, 21(3): 1050-1061.
  • 2Liu Y F, Wu F F. Prisoner dilemma: Generator strategic bidding in electricity markets[J]. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 2007, 52(6): 1143-1149.
  • 3Liu Y F, Wu F F. Risk management of generators' strategic bidding in dynamic oligopolistic electricity market using optimal control[J]. IET Gener Transm Distrib, 2007, 29: 690-697.
  • 4Chow G C. Estimation and optimal control of dynamic game models under rational expectations[C]// Lucas R, Sargent T. Rational Expectation and Econometric Practice. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1980: 681-689.
  • 5Varian H R. Microeconomic Analysis[M]. Norton, 1992: 287-288.
  • 6Sethi S P, Thompson G L. Optimal Control Theory: Application to Management Science and Economics[M]. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000.
  • 7Gutierrez-Alcaraz G, Gerald B S. Electricity market dynamics: Oligopolistic competition[J]. Electric Power Systems Research, 2006, 76: 695-700.
  • 8Lijesen M G. The real-time price elasticity of electricity[J]. Energy Economics, 2007, 29: 249-258.
  • 9Arellano M S, Pablo S. A model of market power in electricity industries subject to peak load pricing[J]. Energy Policy, 2007, 35: 5130-5135.
  • 10http://www.ucei.berkeley.edu/.

同被引文献13

  • 1刘炜.关于电力施工企业成本管理与控制的探讨.科技促进发展,2009,(01).
  • 2Liu Y F,Wu F F. Prisoner dilemma:Generator strategic bidding in electricity markets[J].IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control,2007,(06):1143-1149.doi:10.1109/TAC.2007.899035.
  • 3Chow G C. Estimation and Optimal Control of Dynamic Game Models under Rational Expectations[A].Minneapolis:University of Minnersota Press,1980.681-689.
  • 4Varian H R. Microeconomic Analysis[M].Norton,1992.287-288.
  • 5Olsder G J. Information structures in differential Games[A].New York,1977.99-135.
  • 6Pindyck R S,Rubinfeld D L. Microeconomics[M].Prentice-Hall,Inc,1998.205-288.
  • 7Kendrick D A. Stochastic Control for Economic Analysis[M].McGraw-Hill,Inc,1981.
  • 8王玉华.电力施工企业的成本控制[J].经济研究导刊,2009(5):201-202. 被引量:26
  • 9姜莹,郭洪波.浅谈电力施工企业人力使用成本的控制方法[J].中国电力教育(下),2009(1):240-241. 被引量:1
  • 10付茂昌.阐述电力企业成本管理与控制[J].建材与装饰(上旬),2010(1):226-227. 被引量:1

引证文献2

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部