摘要
目的探讨3种方案治疗小儿肺炎的成本-效果比率,为临床治疗提供依据。方法对2007年1月-2008年1月间住院的96例小儿肺炎采用的3种治疗方案进行成本-效果分析。结果A组总有效率为90.63%,B组总有效率为87.50%,C组总有效率为81.25%,3组总有效率比较差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05);不良反应发生率A组为3.13%,B组为6.25%,C组为6.25%,3组不良反应发生率比较差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05);C组C/E、△C/△E为3组中最低。结论C组方案为较佳治疗方案。
Objective To investigate the cost-effectiveness rates of three schemes in treating children pneumonia. Methods Three schemes in treating pneumonia of 96 children were analyzed by the cost effectiveness for clinical treatment. Results The total effective rates were 90.63% in A group, 87.50% in B group, 81.25% in C group, and there was no difference in three groups(P〉0.05). The adverse effect rates were 3.13% in A group, 6.25%in B group, 6.25% in C group, and there was no difference in three groups(P〉0.05).The C/ E and AC/A E of C group was lowest in three groups. Conclusions The C schemes in treating children pneumonia was the ideal therapeutic schemes.
出处
《国际医药卫生导报》
2009年第2期23-25,共3页
International Medicine and Health Guidance News
关键词
小儿
肺炎
成本
效果分析
Children
Pneumonia
Analysis on cost-effectiveness