现代民法典对知识产权制度的接纳

Supported by National social Science foundation of China

知识产权是一项重要的民事权利,是财产权体系内不可或缺的部分,将知识产权制度纳入民法典既是完善民事权利体系,发挥民法典作为民事基本法作用的必然要求,也是知识产权制度自身体系建设的需要。现有的民法典草案对知识产权制度给予了极少的关注,仅以数个宣示性的条文作为民法典和知识产权制度的链接点,其立法努力较《民法通则》显得更为保守。这种链接方式忽略了知识产权在知识经济时代的重要作用,显示了民法典草案体系上和逻辑上的缺陷。

Intellectual Property rights were very important private rights. As a indispensable part in property system, we should admit them into modem Civil Code in order to meet its logical demand . But, legislators neglected the essentiality of IPR in Knowledge Economy Tunes, the draft of Civil Code in China didn＇t give more room for IPR, only use little article as the point of interlink between Civil law and Intellectual Property law. This kind of legislation would be a conservative one, as a result of some systematic and logical limitation in the draft of Civil Code in China.