期刊文献+

经尿道等离子体双极电切剜除法治疗良性前列腺增生280例 被引量:5

TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION OF PROSTATE WITH THE BIPOLAR PLASMA KINETIC TECHNIQUE FOR BENIGN PROSTATE HYPERPLASIA:A REPORT OF 280 CASES
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨经尿道等离子体双极电切剜除法治疗良性前列腺增生的安全性与有效性。方法采用经尿道等离子体双极电切行前列腺剜除280例。前列腺重量40~135g,平均75.0g。结果手术时间35~80min,平均45.0min。切除前列腺组织重量40~110g,平均75.0g。无电切综合征发生。术后4~5d拔除留置导尿管,全部病例排尿通畅。术后出现暂时性尿失禁27例,继发性前列腺出血8例,尿道狭窄9例,无死亡病例,无再次手术及永久性尿失禁等并发症发生。结论经尿道等离子体双极电切剜除法治疗良性前列腺增生安全有效。 Objective To evaluate the effect and safety of transurethral Resection of Prostate with the bipolar plasma kinetic technique (PKRP) in the treatment of benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH). Methods 280 BPH patients underwent transurethral Resection of Prostate with the bipolar plasma kinetic technique. The preoperative estimated weight of the prostate ranged from 40 g to 135 g, averaged 75 g. Results The operation lasted for 35 - 80 min, averaging 45 min. The removed tissues weighed 40 - 110 g, averaging 75 g. During the operation no transurethral resection (TUR) syndrome occurred. The catheter was removed 4 - 5 days after the operation. 27eases of temporal incontinence. 8 cases of perioperative hemorrhage and 9 ease of urethral stricture occurred, and there were no death, re - operation and permanent urinary incontinence in these case. Conclusion Transurethral Resection of Prostate with the bipolar plasma kinetic technique is a safe and effective means for the treatment of BPH.
机构地区 阳江市人民医院
出处 《现代医院》 2009年第1期39-41,共3页 Modern Hospitals
关键词 前列腺增生 等离子体双极电切 经尿道前列腺剜除 Benign prostatic hyperplasia, Plasma kinetic resection, Transurethral resection
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献25

  • 1Zwergel U, Wullich B, Lindenmeir U, et al. Long-term results following transurethral resection of the prostate. Eur Urel, 1998,33:476-480.
  • 2Ekengern J, Hahn RG. Complications during transurcthral vaporization of the prostate. Urology, 1996,48:424-426.
  • 3Kaplan SA, Te AE. Transurethral electrovaporization of the prostate : A novel method for treating men with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Urology, 1995,45:566-569.
  • 4Saad F, Carrier S, Joliver-Tremblay M. Comparison of prostatic electrovaporization and transurethral resection in the treatment of benign prostatic hypertrophy. Ann Chir, 1997,51:884-886.
  • 5Tuhkanen K, Heino A, Ala-Opas M. Contact laser prostatectomy compared to TURP in prostatic hypcrplasia smaller than 40ml. Six-month follow-up with complex urodynamic assessment. Scand J Urel Ncphrel, 1999,33:31-34.
  • 6杨培谦 张玉海.经尿道前列腺汽化电切术,前列腺外科[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2001.236-242.
  • 7Holtgrewe HL,Dowd JB.Transurethral prostatectomy: Practece aspects of the dominant operation in American urology[J]. J Urol,1989,141: 248.
  • 8BottoHenry,barre P.Electro-vaporisation of the prostate with the Gyrus device[J].Eur Urol,2000,37(2):171-175.
  • 9张心缇.经尿道前列腺切除术[A]..北京医科大学泌尿外科人才工程培训中心教材-前列腺增生·前列腺癌[M].北京:北京医科大学,1999.41-44.
  • 10Kaplam SA, Te AE. Acompararative study of transure thralre section of the prostate using amodified electro- vaporizing loop and transure thralva poriztion of the prostate[J]. J Urol, 1995, 154:1785.

共引文献264

同被引文献41

引证文献5

二级引证文献29

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部