期刊文献+

斑点免疫结合试验与间接血凝试验和对流免疫电泳试验在包虫病诊断中的比较 被引量:5

Comparison of DIBA and IHA、 CIEP in Diagnostic Value for Human Hydatidosis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:为了进一步了解斑点免疫结合试验(DIBA)诊断包虫病的敏感性和特异性,进行血清特异抗体的检测,并与间接血凝试验(IHA)和对流免疫电泳试验(CIEP)作比较。方法:用羊肝细粒棘球蚴液抗原对94例包虫病患者、22例非包虫病患者和45例健康人血清进行了DIBA、IHA和CIEP。结果:DIBA、IHA、CIEP的阳性率分别为92.6%、86.2%和63.8%,DIBA的阳性率明显高于CIEP(P<0.01),而与IHA无统计学差别;假阳性率分别为5.8%、9.0%和0。结论:DIBA的敏感性高于IHA和CIEP,且与CIEP有显著差异;DIBA的特异性高于IHA,但低于CIEP。在诊断包虫病时,应同时使用两种以上免疫试验。 Objective: To further understand the sensitivity and specificity of DIBA in diagnotic value for human hydatidosis, and to contrast the IHA with CIEP. Methods: DIBA, IHA and CIEP were performed with antigen from sheep's hepatic hydatid fluid on sera of 94 patients with hydatid disease, 22 patients of non hydatid disease and 45 healthy adults. Results: The positive rates of the DIBA, IHA and CIEP were 92.6%,86.2% and 63.8% respectively, DIBA was much higher than the CIEP (P<0.01), but no significant difference between the DIBA and IHA. The pseudo positive rates of DIBA, IHA and CIEP were 5.8%, 9.0% and 0 respectively. Conclusions: The sensitivity of the DIBA is higher than the IHA and CIEP, the difference is significant between DIBA and CIEP; Specificity of the DIBA is higher than the IHA, but lower than the CIEP. More than two kinds of immunity test should be used in the same time on the diagnosis of hydatid disease in order to increase the accuracy rate of diagnosis.
出处 《新疆医学院学报》 1998年第2期111-113,共3页
关键词 包虫病 诊断 斑点ELISA IHA CIEP hydatidosis diagnosis DIBA IHA CIEP
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

共引文献11

同被引文献68

引证文献5

二级引证文献27

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部