期刊文献+

腐败行为及其治理选择——基于前景理论的研究 被引量:11

Corruption and Measures for Anticorruption——A Study Based on Prospect Theory
下载PDF
导出
摘要 提出一个应用前景理论研究腐败行为的分析架构,考察腐败行为的特征、治理手段及其效率。研究发现,对于存在非理性偏差的腐败行为,加大惩罚力度的效果取决于行为人所受处罚的相对风险规避度量,一定条件下存在"惩罚陷阱":加大惩处力度反而使行为人加大腐败投入,选择高风险的腐败行为,此时行为人存在极端的赌徒心态。一个弹性的惩罚制度等同于一个对腐败的边际惩罚递减的惩罚制度,会增加行为人的腐败价值预期,增强行为人逃避严惩的侥幸心理,加剧腐败行为蔓延。并且,弹性越大,行为人绝对风险规避度越小,腐败行为的收入预期越高,腐败蔓延的速度越快。高薪的激励效果则依赖于监督惩罚环境、薪酬支付体系与行为人的价值取向。对处于经济转型的发展中国家而言,经济发展不平衡,利益矛盾冲突加剧,强烈冲击人们的价值取向与行为规范,行为人不患寡而患不均,提高官员薪酬的激励手段难以取得好的反腐效果。优化监督执法环境与公务员的选才机制是治理腐败的有效手段。 The prospect theory is one of the two important pillars upon which the whole of behavioral decision theory rests. This article puts forward a method to studying corruption with prospect theory. In the article, we show that the increase in the severity of punishments will not always deter corrupt behavior because of offender's incomplete rationality. Whether the increasing punishment is effective or not depends on offender's Arrow-Pratt measure for relative risk aversion. Under certain conditions,there is a 'punishment trap' in which even if punishment is more severe,offender may be more likely to commit corruption when opportunities arise. It is also found that flexible regulations on punishments and lenient penalty can result in the anticipation of high benefit and low risk of corruption,encouraging the fluke mindedness and giving rise to the persistence and pervasiveness of corruption. Then it follows that an effective mechanism to contain corruption should include establishing a scientific system of personnel, optimizing the regulatory function and enhancing the enforcement of penalty.
出处 《公共管理学报》 CSSCI 2008年第4期46-52,共7页 Journal of Public Management
基金 国家社会科学基金资助项目(07BJY017)
关键词 腐败治理 前景理论 风险偏好 惩罚陷阱 Measures for Anticorruption Prospect Theory Risk Preference Punishment Trap
  • 相关文献

参考文献32

  • 1[1]LUIS A S.Wages and Other Determinants of Corruption[J].Review of Development Economics,2004,8(4):597-605.
  • 2[2]GOEL K,RICH P.On The Economic Incentives for Taking bribes[J].Public Choice,1989,61(3):269-275.
  • 3[3]DAVID S L,JUSTIN M.Crime,Punishment,and Myopia[R].Cambridge,Massachusetts:NBER,2005.
  • 4[4]POLINSKY A M.Corruption and Optimal Law Enforcement[R].Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard Law School,1999.
  • 5[5]BOWLES R,GAROUPA N.Casual Police Corruption and The Economics of Crime[J].International Review of Law and Economics,1997,17(1):75-87.
  • 6[6]DICKENS W T.Crime and Punishment Again:The Eco-nomic Approach with a Psychological Twist[R].Cambridge,Massachusetts:NBER,1986.
  • 7[7]SHEETAL K C,MOENE K O.Controlling Fiscal Corruption[J].World Development,1999,27(7):1129-1140.
  • 8[8]ANDVIG J C,MOENE K O.How Corruption May Corrupt[J].Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization,1990(13):63-76.
  • 9[9]SVENSSON J.Eight Questions about Corruption[J].Journal of Economic Perspectives,2005,19(3):19-42.
  • 10[10]JAIN,ARVIND K.Corruption:a Review[J].Journal of Economic Surveys,2001,15(1):71-121.

二级参考文献27

  • 1胡长和.从“效率工资”看高薪养廉问题[J].江西财经大学学报,1999(5):20-22. 被引量:6
  • 2蔡定剑.重论民主或为民主辩护 对当前反民主理论的回答[J].中外法学,2007,19(3):257-279. 被引量:22
  • 3谢鹏程.重构民主与法制的关系[J].法学研究,2007,29(4):149-149. 被引量:1
  • 4[13][美]乔·萨托利.民主新论[M].东方出版社,1998:444.
  • 5[3][美]卡尔·科恩.论民主[M].聂崇信,朱秀贤,译.北京:商务印书馆,2005.
  • 6[6][德]约瑟夫·夏辛,[德]容敏德.法治[M].阿登纳基金会,译.北京:法律出版社,2005.
  • 7[15][美]凯斯·R·孙斯坦.设计民主:论宪法的作用[M].金朝武等,译.法律出版社,2006.
  • 8[17]列宁.列宁全集:第18卷[M].北京:人民出版社,1995.
  • 9陈平其.《对高薪养廉制度的实证分析》.《理论探讨》,2000,(6).
  • 10Shapiro, C. and J. E. Stiglitz, Equilibrium Unemployment as a Worker Discipline Device,American Economic Review[J].1984, 74 (3), 433-444.

共引文献19

同被引文献100

引证文献11

二级引证文献33

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部