标准的反骨

The Standard Revolt

衡量诗的好坏的标准是在诗的生产过程中同时孕育,还是要从诗的圆周上去找那轻轻触碰的切线呢?在群情激愤的形势下,任何标准的提出都可能被认为那无法亲吻圆周的直线在自甘堕落。一般而言,"标准"意味着受约束,同时,"标准"的讨论往往还意味着文学批评家竭力要弄清什么。标准应是与共识有关的东西,但审美与鉴赏因人而异,达成共识几乎不可能。所以,现在所做的工作无非都是在可能存在的标准与描述标准形貌的修辞之间建立一条通道。我们所谓的"标准",首先是一种标准的意识微澜,然后,是一种在言辞上溜达着的标准形体。

Where should the criteria for judging the quality of poems be found--in the course of poem- creation or from external factors？ In the circumstance of exhilaration, any proposed criterion is apt to decline because of misunderstanding. Generally speaking, ＂criteria＂ mean constraint and any discussion on ＂criteria＂ tends to exhibit that literary critics are in vigorous pursuit of something. While criteria should be related to common senses, the attainment of mutual understanding is out of the question since aesthetics and appreciation vary from person to person. As thus, what should be aspired for at present is to establish a passage between the probable criteria and language for picturing the would-be standard criteria. The so-called ＂criterion＂ is, first of all, a standard ripple of consciousness and secondly, a standard pattern freely worded.