耶稣是如何走向十字架的——与周楠本先生商榷

How Jesus Went to the Crucifix

周楠本认为鲁迅在《复仇(其二)》中引用耶稣受难的故事"未能反映犹太历史的真实",其实,鲁迅的引述基本符合福音书的记载。周文用阶级论解读四福音书中的耶稣,既不符合耶稣时代犹太社会的政治形态,也曲解了耶稣的思想和行为。《圣经》是建立在有神论根基之上的。在福音书里,耶稣自始至终是作为有神性的人子被记录的。若依照福音书为史料,对耶稣作正面论述,则须放在神学语境里才能进行,而不能纳入阶级对抗政治变革的话语系统。

Zhou Nanben thinks that Lu Xun, in his Revenge （II）, fails to reflect the truth of the Jewish history by citing the story of Jesus＇ death. Zhou＇s interpretation is not in accordance with the political form of the Jewish community in the times of Jesus, but distorts Jesus＇ thought and deeds. The Bible is based on theism. A positive narration of Jesus should be put in the context of theology instead of the discourse system involving class confrontation and political reform.