期刊文献+

一个被忽视的命题:大城市公共组织的传统因素--托克维尔和奥斯特罗姆关于美国经验观察的比较

A Proposition Neglected:Traditional Factors Affecting Metropolitan Public Organization——A Compare between Tocqueville and Ostrom
下载PDF
导出
摘要 大城市治理作为全球性难题,其公共组织是备受关注的关键之一。一般认为,地方政府组织传统已经难以适应当前发展,故而传统因素被忽略乃至摒弃。"大城市改革运动"在欧美一度盛行,但在美国却屡屡受挫;对此,奥斯特罗姆等重新发现了150多年前托克维尔所观察到的美国地方政府组织传统的重要作用,历经一个半世纪城市化进程的挑战与调整,它不仅生命力至今犹存,更将影响美国大城市的治理方向。放开来看,不少发达国家的相关变革在经历表面价值的纷繁变化之后,也逐步深入到所根植的制度、社会与文化传统之中:大城市公共组织的传统因素是影响未来的重要命题。 As a difficult global issue,metropolitan governance has drawn much attention,so does its public organization.In general idea,traditional factors affecting local governmental organization are neglected or even abandoned,because they are treated as unsuitable element under the current development situation.Metropolitan reform movement often encounters frustration in the USA,although it took popularity in many other Western countries.Ostrom etc,re-discovered the important role of traditional factors in US local government,which Tocqueville found 150 years ago.And the former also noticed that traditional factors still keep their vitality against all the challenges and regulation by urbanization during the last 150 years.And what is more,these factors will affect metropolitan governance development in US.Implying a broader view,we can find that after various superficial values were proved failure,such reforms in many developed countries have gradually turned back to their institutional,social and cultural tradition which they embed.In conclusion,traditional factors affecting metropolitan public organization is a future key proposition in the governance.
作者 林拓
出处 《社会科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第2期93-100,共8页 Journal of Social Sciences
基金 国家社科基金(02BZZ031) 教育部人文社科基地重大项目(05JJDZH2292) 教育部新世纪人才支持计划(NCET-05-0429) 上海曙光学者计划(05SG31)的阶段性成果
关键词 大城市 公共组织 传统因素 Metropolis Public organization Traditional factors
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1《美国地方政府》,井敏,陈幽泓翻译,由北京大学出版社,2005年出版.
  • 2奥斯特罗姆.《合众公共国的政治理论》.
  • 3[美]罗伯特·B.登哈特.《公共组织理论》(第3版),扶松茂,丁力译,竺乾威校,中国人民大学出版社2003年版.
  • 4[美]小罗伯特·B.哈金斯.《<美国地方政府>英文版序》,载《美国地方政府》,北京大学出版社2005年版,第19页.
  • 5Ostrom, Elinor,“Metropolitan Reform : Propositions Derived from Two Traditions”, Social Scierwe Quarterly, 53 (1972) , pp. 485 - 490.
  • 6[美]文森特·奥斯特罗姆等.《美国地方政府》,第65-68,71页.
  • 7David Rusk , Cities without suburbs, Washington D.C. :The Woodrow Wilison Center press, 1995.
  • 8王旭.城市地域扩大,政府规模变小——20世纪美国城市和区域发展的基本走向[J].求是学刊,2008,35(1):126-132. 被引量:5
  • 9[法]托克维尔.《美国的民主》上卷,董果良译,商务印书馆1988年版,第100页.
  • 10倪玉珍.托克维尔理解民主的独特视角:作为一种“社会状况”的民主[J].社会学研究,2008(3):79-91. 被引量:19

二级参考文献24

  • 1托克维尔.《论美国的民主》[M].北京:商务印书馆,1997..
  • 2U.S. Census Bureau. Census 2000, Population and Housing Unit Counts, United States[EB/OL]. http://www.census.gov.
  • 3MYRON ORFIELD. American Metropolitics: The New Suburban Reality[M].Brookings Institution Press, 2002.
  • 4Jon C. TEAFOTD. City and Suburb: The Political Fragmentation of Metropolitan America, 1850-1970[M]. The John Hopkins University Press, 1979.
  • 5STEPHEN CALABRESRE et al. Local Government Fiscal Structure and Metropolitan Consolidation[A].Papers on Urban Affairs 2002[C]. Brookings Institution, 2002.
  • 6THOMAS H. REED. Progress in Metropolitan Integration[J]. Public Administration Review, 9 Winter, 1949.
  • 7DOUGLAS YATES. Neighborhood Democracy: The Politics and Impacts of Decentralization[M]. Lexington, Mass. 1973.
  • 8Thad L. Beyle. State and Local Government, 2000-2001[M]. Washington, D.C. 2000.
  • 9ERIC SCHMITT. Cities and Their Suburbs Are Seen Growing as Units[N].New York Times, July 10, 2001.
  • 10US Conference of Mayors. If the U.S. City/County Metro Economies Were Nations[EB/OL]. http://www.usmayors.org/70thAnnualMeet ing/metroecon2002/MetroNations.pdf.

共引文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部