期刊文献+

语言的群体间偏差研究 被引量:7

An Experimental Research on Linguistic Intergroup Bias
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文概述了语言的群体间偏差现象,这一现象的表现为:个体在描述正向或负向行为时,会由于描述对象是否与自己属于同一群体而在描述语言抽象性上存在差异。通过使用固定和自由反应研究范式,用实验方法进行研究,结果验证了这一现象在汉语背景下的存在。通过讨论这一偏差现象在刻板印象的维持与传播中的作用,及其在测量偏见上的应用,指出语言的群体间偏差现象在社会心理学研究中的重要价值。 The article is a summary of the phenomena of linguistic intergroup bias(LIB). The bias means that one may use different abstract levels of language to describe the positive and negative behaviors of people depending on whether the target is in-group or out- group. Experiments of both fixed response and free response paradigms demonstrated that this phenomenon also existed in Chinese cultural backgrounds. The paper's discussion about the potential effeet of LIB on maintaining and transmitting stereotypes and its application in measuring prejudice indicates that LIB is an important issue in the field of social psychological research.
出处 《心理科学》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2009年第1期106-109,共4页 Journal of Psychological Science
基金 河南省教育厅人文社会科学研究项目(2007-QN-012) 新乡医学院科技计划资助项目(2007YJA54)
关键词 语言的群体间偏差 语言范畴模型 语言抽象水平 linguistic intergroup bias, linguistic category model, linguistic abstract
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Semin G R. Agenda 2000: Communication: Language as an implementational device for cognition. European Journal of Social Psychology, 2000, 30: 595- 612
  • 2Semin G R, Fiedle K. The cognitive functions of linguistic category in describing persons: Social cognition and language. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1988, 54(4) : 558- 569
  • 3Semin G R, Fiedle K. The Linguistic Category Model, Its Bases, Applications and Range. In : Stroebe W, Hewstone M. eds, European Review of Social Psychology, Vol. 2. Chichester, England: Wiley, 1991. 1-30
  • 4Maass A, Salvi D, Arcuri L, et al. Language use in intergroup contexts: The linguistic intergroup bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1989, 57:981 -993
  • 5Maass A. Linguistic intergroup bias. Stereotype perpetuation through language. In: Zanna M P. eds, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology Vol. 31. San Diego, CA. Academic Press, 1999: 79-121
  • 6Maass A, Milesi A, Zabbini S, et al. The linguistic intergroup bias: Differential expectancies or ingroup protection? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1995, 68: 116- 126
  • 7Tajfel H, Turner J C. An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In: Austin W S, Worchel S eds, The social psychology of intergroup relations. Monterey. CA; Brooks/Cole, 33 - 47
  • 8Maass A, Ceccarelli R, Rudin S. Linguistic intergroup bias. Evidence for in- group - protective motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1996, 71 (3):512- 526
  • 9Wigboldus D H J, Semin G R, Spears R. How do we communicate stereotypes? Linguistic bases and inferential consequences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2000, 78(1): 5-18
  • 10Tanabe Y, Oka T. Linguistic intergroup bias in Japan. Japanese Psychological Research, 2001, 43: 104- 111

同被引文献219

引证文献7

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部