期刊文献+

范畴化与原型理论对“程度副词+名词”结构的解释能力 被引量:11

Interpretive Power of Categorization and Prototype Theory as Regards "Degree Adverbs+Noun" Structure
原文传递
导出
摘要 人类通过语言对世界万物进行分类。当代语言学家用范畴化(categorization)一词来指称人类分类这一认知活动。"原型(prototype)"范畴理论是范畴化理论的最新发展。属于同一词类的词有典型成员和非典型成员之别,典型成员是一类词的原型。"很爷们"之类的"程度副词+名词"结构(副名结构)也有典型和非典型之分。研究首次提出,越是处于边缘的、越是具有内涵意义的非典型名词,越容易进入副名结构。名词从抽象名词-指人名词-指物名词-直到专有名词呈现着接受程度副词修饰时从易到难的规律。而成功创作副名结构时具有操作性的建议是:尽可能使用抽象名词,之后是使用指人名词和指物名词,使用专有名词时要有充足的社会语境和/或语言语境。 Human beings categorize act of human beings as categorization. things by linguistic means. Contemporary linguists name this cognitive "Prototype" theory is the latest development of categorization theory. Words from the same category can be classified as typical members and non-typical ones. Typical members are prototypes of one category. "Degree adverbs +noun" structure (Adv. + N Structure) like "very man" can also be classified as typical and non-typical. According to the new findings of this research, the more marginal and the richer a non-typical noun is, the easier for it to enter into the "degree adverbs + noun" structure. Nouns, ranging from abstract nouns to people-related nouns, from thing-related nouns to proper nouns, manifest a pattern of acceptance with increasing difficulty when being modified by degree adverbs. The workable suggestion of creating successful "Adv. + N Structure" is to prioritize abstract nouns as much as possible over people-related and thing-related nouns; when it comes to the use of proper nouns, sufficient social or linguistic contexts are needed.
作者 刘茁
出处 《深圳大学学报(人文社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第1期127-132,共6页 Journal of Shenzhen University:Humanities & Social Sciences
关键词 范畴化 原型 “程度副词+名词”结构 内涵意义 categorization prototype "degree adverbs +noun" structure connotations
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1邢福义.关于副词修饰名词[J].中国语文,1962(5):215-217. 被引量:68
  • 2邢福义.“很淑女”之类说法语言文化背景的思考[J].语言研究,1997(2):1-10. 被引量:207
  • 3刘茁.标记理论对名形“转品”现象的解释能力[J].苏州大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2006,22(1):115-118. 被引量:2
  • 4Taylor, J. R. Linguistic Categorization: Prototypes in Linguistic Theory [M]. New York: Oxford Press, 1989.
  • 5吴世雄,陈维振.范畴理论的发展及其对认知语言学的贡献[J].外国语,2004,27(4):34-40. 被引量:95
  • 6Berlin, B. & P. Kay. Basic Color Terms: Their Universality and Evolution[M]. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1969.
  • 7Rosch, E. Natural categories[J]. Cognitive Linguistics, 1973, (4).
  • 8Rosch, E. Cognitive representations of semantic categories [J]. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,1975.
  • 9Labov, W. The boundaries of words and their meaning[C]. Charles-James N. Bailey & Roger W. Shuy (eds.). New ways of analyzing variation in English. [M]. Washington D. C.: Georgetown University Press,1973.
  • 10Labov, W. Denotational Structure[C]. Donka Farkas, Wesley M. Jacobsen and Karol W. Todrys (eds.). Papers from the Parasession on the lexicon. Chicago: Chicago Linguistics Society, 1978

二级参考文献25

  • 1肖贤彬.关于语言的“陌生化”[J].汉语学习,1995(1):30-31. 被引量:10
  • 2崔延强.关于亚里士多德所理解的“范畴”一词考释[J].江淮论坛,1993(1):26-28. 被引量:4
  • 3吴世雄,陈维振.论语义范畴的家族相似性[J].外语教学与研究,1996,28(4):14-19. 被引量:73
  • 4Jack C Richards, John Plait, Heidi Platt. Longman Dictionary of Language Teaching & Applied Linguistics [ M ]. London: Longman Group UK Limited, 1992.
  • 5R.R.H.哈特曼 F.C.斯托克.语言与语言学词典[M].北京:北京语言学院出版社,1991..
  • 6M. Baker. In Other Words [ M ]. London: Routledge, 1992.
  • 7Geophry, N. Leech. A Linguistic Guide to English Poetry [ M ], London & New York: Longman, 1987.
  • 8Hadumod Bussman. Routledge Dictionary of language and Linguistics [ M ]. London: Routledge, 1996.
  • 9P.H. Mathews. Oxford Concise Dictionary of Linguistics [ M ]. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press, 2000.
  • 10George Yule. Pragmatics [ M ]. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press, 2000.

共引文献375

同被引文献184

引证文献11

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部