期刊文献+

基于参数空间分布的海洋生态系统模拟 被引量:4

Marine Ecosystem Modelling Based on Spatial Parameterizations
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在模拟大尺度海洋生态系统时,由于子区域的生态系统有着各自的特征,导致参数值在空间上存在差异,因此参数在整个研究区域取常数的做法必须改进。基于此,使用气候模式FOAM的气侯态背景场驱动一个简单的三维海洋生态系统模型,并引入参数的空间分布,在全球尺度上通过伴随方法同化SeaWiFS叶绿素资料。引入参数空间分布后,同化结果得到很大改进:浮游植物表层生物量(氮)的平均差从0.1553减小至0.0606mmol·m-3,下降了60.9%,有效地降低了模拟值与观测值在空间上的差异;浮游植物表层生物量平均值也从0.1031上升至0.1252mmol·m-3,更接近SeaWiFS观测。实验结果表明通过引入参数的空间分布来改进海洋生态系统的模拟是可行的。 In modelling a large scale ecosystem, parameterization for one region should differ from that for another because the regional ecosystem might have the features of itself. Therefore it should be improved that the same set of parameters are used to model a large scale of system. For the improvement purpose, a simple 3D marine ecosystem model with the regional parameterizations is forced by the climate background field output from the FOAM climate model, and the adjoint assimilation technique is applied to the global chlorophll data of the sea WIFS. After the regional parameterizations have been used, the assimilation results become much better. The average error for the surface phytoplankton (N) is reduced from 0. 155 3 to 0. 060 6 mmol·m^-3, with a reducing rate of 60.9%. Therefore, the difference between the model results and the observations becomes effectively decreased. Also the mean value for surface phytoplankton rises from 0. 103 1 to 0. 125 2 mmol·m^-3, being closer to the SeaWiFS value from the observations. It is shown from the results that the regional parameterizations for the marine ecosystem modelling improve ment is feasible.
作者 樊伟 吕咸青
出处 《海洋科学进展》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2009年第1期24-33,共10页 Advances in Marine Science
基金 国家高技术研究发展计划项目--南海内潮的多源信息同化技术(2007AA09Z118) 国家重点基础研究发展计划项目--信息集成与环境安全保障对策(2005CB422308) 高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金项目--三维潮汐潮流的伴随同化技术研究(20050423007)
关键词 伴随同化方法 敏感性分析 海洋生态系统模型 参数空间分布 adjoint data-assimilation sensitivity analysis marine ecosystem model spatial parameteriza-tion
  • 相关文献

参考文献25

  • 1FRANKS P J S. NPZ models of plankton dynamics: Their construction, coupling to physics, and application[J].Journal of Oceanography,2002,58(2):379-387.
  • 2KANTHA L H. A general ecosystem model for applications to studies of carbon cycling and primary productivity in the global oceans[J]. Ocean Modelling, 2004,6(3 -4):285-334.
  • 3MOORE J K, DONEY S C, GLOVER D M. , et al. Iron cycling and nutrient limitation patterns in surface waters of the World Ocean[J]. Deep Sea Research Ⅱ,2002,49(1-3):463-507.
  • 4GREGG W W, GINOUX P, SCHOPF P S, et al. Phytoplankton and iron: validation of a global three-dimensional ocean biogeochemical model[J]. Deep Sea Research Ⅱ, 2003,50(22 -26):3143 -3169.
  • 5RAICK C, SOETAERT K, GREGOIRE M. Model complexity and performance: How far can we simplify[J]. Progress in Oceanography, 2006,70(1) :27-57.
  • 6LOSA S N. VEZINA A, WRIGHT D, et al. 3D ecosyslem modelling in the North Atlantic: Relalive impacts of physical and biological parameterizations[J]. Journal of Marine Systems, 2006,61(3 4) :230 -245.
  • 7FRIEDRICHS M A M, Hood R R, WOGGERT J D. Ecosystem model complexity versus physical forcing: Quantification of their relative impact with assimilated Arabian Sea data[J]. Deep Sea Research Ⅱ, 2006,53(5 7):576-600.
  • 8EVANSG T. The role of local models and data sets in the Joint Global Ocean Flux Study[J]. Deep Sea Research I, 1999,46(8):1369- 1389.
  • 9FENNEL K, I.OSCH M, SCHROTER J, et al. Testing a marine ecosystem model: sensitivity analysis and parameter optimization[J].Journal of Marine Systems, 2001, 28(1- 2):45- 63.
  • 10LOSA S N, KIVMAN G A, RYABCHENKO V A. Weak constraint parameter estimation for a simple ocean ecosystem model: what can we learn about the model and data[J]. Journal of Marine Systems, 2004,45( 1-2):1-20.

二级参考文献21

  • 1Schartau M, Oschlie A, Willebrand J. Parameter estimates of a zero-dimensional ecosystem model applying the adjoint method. Deep sea Research Ⅱ, 2001, 48:1769-1800.
  • 2Fennel K, Losch M, Schroter J, et al. Testing a marine ecosystem model:sensitivity analysis and parameler optimization. Journal of Marine .Systems , 2001, 28:45-63.
  • 3Friedrichs M A M. A data assimilative marine ecosystem model of the central equatorial Pacific: Numerical twin experiments. Journal of Marine Research, 2001, 59:859-894.
  • 4Friedrichs M A M. Assimilation of JGOFS EqPac and SeaWiFS data into a marine ecosystem model of the central equatorial Pacific Ocean. Deep Sea Research Ⅱ, 2002, 49:289-319.
  • 5Garcia-Gorriz E, Hoepffner N, Ouberdous M. Assimilation of SeaWiFS data in a coupled physical-biological model of Adiatic Sea. Jounnal of Marine Systems, 2003, 40-41:232-252.
  • 6Kuroda H, Kishi M J. A data assimilation technique applied to estimate parameters for the NEMURO marine ecosystem model. Ecological Modelling, 2004, 172 : 69-85.
  • 7Lawson L M, Hofmann E E, Spitz Y H. Time series sampling and data assimilation in a simple marine ecosystem model. Deep Sea Research H, 1996, 43 (2-3) : 625-651.
  • 8Lawson L M, Spitz Y H, Hofmann E E, et al. A data assimilation technique applied to a predator-prey model. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, 1995, 57:593-617.
  • 9Spitz Y H, Moisan J R, Abbott M R. Configuration an ecosystem model using data from the Bermuda, Atlantic Time Series (BATS). Deep Sea Research Ⅱ, 2001, 48: 1733-1768.
  • 10Spitz Y H, Moisan J R, Abbort M R, et al. Data assimilation and a pelagic ecosystem model: parameterization using time series observations. Journal of Marine Systems, 1998, 16:51-68.

共引文献8

同被引文献97

引证文献4

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部