脑血管病支架置入后应用YM-GU-1229型动脉压迫止血器和传统加压法的比较

YM-GU-1229 artery compression hemostat versus conventional manual compression following interventional treatment of cerebrovascular disease

选择2007-01/2008-01解放军沈阳军区总医院神经外科接受经皮股动脉穿刺脑血管病支架置入患者100例,按支架置入后是否应用止血器分为2组,每组50例。观察组:应用YM-GU-1229型动脉压迫止血器止血,对照组:采用传统人工按压沙袋加压的方法止血。比较2组止血操作及制动时间的差异,并观察2组患者舒适度等相关副作用的情况。结果显示观察组止血操作及制动时间明显少于对照组(P<0.01);患者舒适度等相关副作用的发生率明显低于对照组(P<0.05)。提示脑血管病支架置入后应用YM-GU-1229型动脉压迫止血器明显缩短止血操作及制动时间,减轻了操作者的劳动强度,也缓解了患者的身心不适。

100 patients undergoing interventional treatment of cerebrovascular disease through femoral artery puncture in Department of Neurosurgery, General Hospital of Shenyang Military Area Command of Chinese PLA between January 2007 and January 2008 were divided into two groups according to whether applying the hemostat （n=50）. In the observation group, the YM-GU-1229 artery compression hemostat was adopted; while in the control group the conventional manual compression and sand bag compression was adopted. The differences in the operation of stopping bleeding and the time of restrain were compared between the two groups, and the situations of comfort and the relative adverse effects were observed. The results show that the operation of stopping bleeding and the time of restrain in the observation group was obviously less than the control group （P 〈 0.01）; the incidence rates of comfort degree and the relevant adverse effects were obviously lower than the control group （P 〈 0.05）. YM-GU-1229 artery compression hemostat after interventional treatment of cerebrovascular disease significantly shortens time of stopping bleeding and restrain, thereby lightens the workload of operators and mitigate the body and mental discomfort of patients.