摘要
从文化遗产的原真性原则和横店"圆明新园"项目方的公开发言出发,论证横店项目是一个主题公园项目,而非文物建筑的重建。苏实的文章对梁思成先生关于中国文物建筑"不求原物长存"总结的理解存在方向性错误,苏文以横店项目为"一些‘假古董’正名"的立论存在诸多不当之处。
Starting from the authenticity of cultural heritage and the open statement of the project developer for Hengdian New Yuanmingyuan, this paper demonstrates that the Hengdian project is not a reconstruction project of architectural relics but a theme park. Mr. Sushi has a wrong understanding of Liang Sicheng' saying about Chinese architectural heritage "not pursuing the eternal existence of the authentic building" quoted by Su's article. It is not appropriate for Su Shi to take the Hengdian project as example to testify the value of "pseudo antique"
出处
《建筑学报》
北大核心
2008年第12期84-86,共3页
Architectural Journal
关键词
圆明园重建
文化遗产
不求原物长存
假古董
reconstruction of Yuanmingyuan, cultural heritage, "not pursuing the eternal existence of the authentic building", pseudo antique