SPS壁垒的评判标准探讨被引量：12

On Criteria for SPS Measure or SPS Barrier

下载PDF

导出

摘要文章解析了SPS兴起的经济学基础,梳理了SPS措施与技术性贸易措施及绿色贸易措施的关系,进而根据WTO相关规则原创性地提出了评判正当SPS措施的8条标准,并且分析了这些标准背后隐藏的问题。文章提出,我国针对SPS措施和SPS壁垒应采取不同的应对策略:积极"遵从"国际贸易中正当的SPS措施;向WTO争端解决机制"申诉",运用法律和谈判手段解决SPS壁垒;对于我国和其他发展中国家面临的客观"SPS壁垒",国际组织应尽快澄清SPS协议中的模糊规定,提高SPS协议的执行度;同时,国际组织和发达国家要积极援助发展中国家,提高他们的遵从能力,发展中国家也要积极主动参与国际标准的制定,从游戏规则的被动接受者转变为制定者。 This paper expiained clearly the difference of Sanitary and Phytosanitary （SPS） measure, TBT （technical barrier for trade） measure, and green barrier, SPS measure and SPS barrier. Then it presented originally the eight criteria for judging SPS barriers. Based on these, the paper gave the different options for SPS measures and SPS barrier, i.e. WTO members should comply with the qualified SPS measures and try to settle the SPS barrier by negotiation and lawsuit. However, for the objective SPS ＂barrier＂, which the developing countries have been meeting in trade, the international organization and developed countries should solve it mainly by technical assistance.

作者董银果

机构地区上海大学

出处《国际商务研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第1期1-9,共9页 International Business Research

基金国家自然科学基金(70873082) 国家软科学基金(2007GX3D082) 商务部与中加小农项目基金

关键词 SPS措施 SPS壁垒评判标准遵从成本 SPS measure SPS barrier judging criteria compliance cost

分类号 F743 [经济管理—国际贸易]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献10

1Beghin, John C. and Bureau, Jean Christophe., 2001a, “Quantitative Policy Analysis of Sanitary, Phytosanitary and Technical Barriers to Trade”[J].Economy International 87, p. 107-130.
2Mattoo A., 2001,“Discriminatory Consequence of Non Discriminatory Standards”[J].American Journal of Agricultural Economic Integration, March.
3黄卫平,程大为.国际贸易中动植物卫生检疫措施的壁垒含义分析[J].中国人民大学学报,2001,15(3):54-60. 被引量：17
4张亚斌,姚志毅.技术标准还是技术壁垒?[J].世界经济与政治,2004(2):72-74. 被引量：25
5Roberts, D. and DeKremer, K. Technical Barriers to US Agricultural Exports[R]. Economic Research Service, USDA, Washington DC. 1997.
6Roberts, D. (1998). A Classification of Technical Trade Barriers in Agricultural Markets[C]. Paper presented at the seminar Food Quality and Safety Standards and Trade in Agricultural and Food Products, Agricultural Economics Society, London, December 1998.
7Otsuki, T., J.S. Wilson and M. Sewadeh “Saving two in a Billion.. A case Study on Quantify the Trade Effect of European Food Safety Standards in African Exports” World Bank, Washington D.C. 2000.
8邓竞成.走出“技术性贸易壁垒”的认识误区[J].财贸研究,2003,14(6):18-21. 被引量：8
9董银果.食品国际贸易规制述评[J].西北农林科技大学学报（自然科学版）,2005,33(9):77-80. 被引量：2
10Mattoo A. Discriminatory Consequence of Non Discriminatory Standards[J]. Journal of Economic Integration, 2001, (3).

二级参考文献19

1邓竟成.“标准”、技术性贸易壁垒与WTO-TBT协议[J].南京财经大学学报,2002(2):25-28. 被引量：3
2董银果,侯军岐.SPS措施对中国猪肉贸易的影响[J].农业技术经济,2005(2):47-51. 被引量：10
3铁征.读懂“技术壁垒”[N].经济日报,2003.6.16.
4Otsuki T,Wilson J S,Sewadeh M.Saving two in a billion:a case study on quantify the trade effect of european food safety standards in african exports[M].Washington D C:World Bank,2000.
5Mattoo A.Discriminatory consequence of non-discriminatory standards[J].Journal of Economic Integration,2001,3:338-359.
6Baker G A.Consumer preferences for food safety attribute in fresh apples:market segments,consumer characteristics and marketing opportunities[J].Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics,1999,21(1):80-97.
7Hayes D,Jason S,Seung Y S,et al.Valuing food safety in experimental auction markets[J].American Journal of Agricultural Economics,1995,77(1):40-53.
8Huang C L,Kamhon K,Tsu-Tan Fu.Joint estimation of consumer preferences and willingness-to-pay for food safety[J].Academia Economic Paper,2000,28(4):429-49.
9Chang H,Kinnucan H.Advertising,information,and product quality:the case of butter[J].American Journal of Agricultural Economics,1991,73(4):1195-1203.
10Hooker N,Caswell J.Trends in food quality management system in processed food trade and foreign direct investment[J].Agribusiness,1996,12(5):411-419.