期刊文献+

证据保全制度的功能及其扩大化 被引量:22

Function and Its Extension of Proof Preserving System
原文传递
导出
摘要 基于诉讼数量不断增长和现代型诉讼要求先收集证据、后提出事实主张的客观需要,为实现预防诉讼、促进诉讼、集中化审理和多元化解决纠纷之目标,两大法系各主要国家纷纷对证据保全及类似制度进行了改革,使证据保全制度除保全证据外,又具有了确定事实、开示证据和诉讼外解决纠纷的多种功能。为强化当事人举证责任,保障当事人证据收集权和证明权的实现,我国也必须扩大证据保全制度的机能,一方面增设确定事物状态和经对方当事人同意之证据保全类型,另一方面鼓励当事人在证据保全程序中就与纠纷解决相关的事项达成协议。 Meanwhile, in litigations, preservation of proof has also transformed from a special way by which the litigants passively collect evidences into an effective measure by which the litigants positively collect evidences. Ultimately, the center of civil proceedings has transferred from trial pro-cedures to pre trial and pre--action ones, from the certification procedures in trial to the pretrial and pre--action proof collection ones. Compared with other countries, Chinese proof preserving system is single--typed, rigidly-termed and conservatively functioned, which does not accord with the world current tide, and cannot satisfy the requirement of reforming civil proceedings and intensifying litigants' burden of proof. Therefore, we should also revise our civil procedural law and extend the function of proof preserving system. On the one hand, we should introduce new types of proof preservation, when litigants have legal interests on determination of state of things, or the opposite litigant assent to,the application for proof preserving by litigants should be allowed, so that they can collect evidences sufficiently before trial. On the other hand, we should recognize the agreement concluded by litigants concerning facts, issues, proof and the whole dispute on the ground of proof preserving, and hence ultimately accomplish the goal of preventing or reducing litigations and settling disputes impartially, quickly and efficiently.
作者 许少波
出处 《法学研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第1期17-32,共16页 Chinese Journal of Law
关键词 证据保全 确定事实 开示证据 诉讼外解决纠纷 proof preserving, determination of facts, discovery of proof, settle disputes otherthan litigation
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献3

  • 1齐树洁.德国民事司法改革及其借鉴意义[J].中国法学,2002(3):163-173. 被引量:30
  • 2北京市房山区人民法院.《“三二一审判机制”的审前准备程序——兼谈法官助理组织民事诉讼庭前准备程序的合理性》.最高人民法院审前准备程序研讨会论文(2003年珠海)[Z].,..
  • 3[美]史蒂文·苏本 蔡彦敏 徐卉 译.美国民事诉讼的真谛[M].北京:法律出版社,2002..

共引文献97

同被引文献172

引证文献22

二级引证文献95

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部