期刊文献+

知识归赋的语境敏感性:三种主要的解释性理论 被引量:3

Context-Sensitivity of Knowledge Attributions:Three Main Explanatory Theories
原文传递
导出
摘要 知识归赋的语境敏感性是指,对于同一个认知主体S和同一个命题p,在不同的语境中,我们会做出不同的知识归赋:在"低"语境中,我们认为"S知道p";而在"高"语境中,我们认为"S不知道p"。语境主义认为,知识归赋的语境敏感性反映了知识归赋的成真条件对归赋语境的敏感性;SSI则认为它反映了知识归赋的成真条件对主体语境的敏感性;与语境主义与SSI的语义解释相反,语用论温和不变主义提出了一种语用解释,它主张用会话适当性条件的语境敏感性来解释知识归赋的语境敏感性。 Context-sensitivity of knowledge attributions is such a phenomenon in Knowledge Attributions that, for the same subject S, and the same proposition p, we can make different knowledge attributions in different contexts: we tend to think that S knows p, in "LOW" context, but that S doesn't know p, in "HIGH" context. Contextualism holds that it is the truth-conditions of knowledge attributions depending on the attributor^s context which lead to this phenomenon of context-sensitivity. However, SSI denies this and maintains instead that the truth-condi tions of knowledge attributions depend on the context of subject. In contrast with the semantic interpretations provided by contextualism and SSI, pragmatic moderate invariantism suggests a pragmatic interpretation according to which Conversational Propriety Conditions depend on conversational context.
作者 阳建国
出处 《自然辩证法研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第1期11-16,共6页 Studies in Dialectics of Nature
基金 教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目"知识论中的语境主义"(08JC720018)
关键词 知识归赋的语境敏感性 语境主义 SSI 语用论温和不变主义 context-sensitivity of knowledge attributions contextualism SSI pragmatic moderate invariantism
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1DeRose Keith. Contextualism and Knowledge Attributions [ J]. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 1992 (52) : 913-929.
  • 2Hawthorne John. Knowledge and Lotteries [M]. Oxford: Claredon Press, 2004.
  • 3Stanley Jason. On the Linguistic Basis for Contextualism [J]. Philosophical Studies, 2004(119 ) : 119-146.
  • 4Williamson Timothy. Contextualism, Subject- Sensitive Invariantism and Knowledge of Knowledge [J]. The Philosophical Quarterly, 2005(55) : 213-235.
  • 5Rysiew Patrick. The Context- Sensitivity of Knowledge Attributions [J]. NOIJS, 2001(35) : 477-514.
  • 6Brown Jessiea. Contextualism and Warranted Assertibility Manoeuvres [J]. Philosophical Studies, 2006 (130) : 407- 435.
  • 7Bach Kent. The Emperor's New ‘Know' [C]// G Preyer, G Peter eds. Contextualism in Philosophy: On Epistemology, Language and Truth. New York: Oxford University Press, 2005.
  • 8DeRose Keith. Solving the Skeptical Problem [J]. Philosophical Review, 1995 (104) : 1-52.
  • 9Cohen Stewart. How to Be A Fallibilist [J]. Philosophical Perspectives, 1988 (2): 91-123.
  • 10Cohen Stewart. Knowledge, Assertion, and Practical Reasoning [J]. Philosophical Issues, 2004(14): 482-491.

同被引文献47

  • 1邓汉慧,张子刚.西蒙的有限理性研究综述[J].中国地质大学学报(社会科学版),2004,4(6):37-41. 被引量:59
  • 2段宏立.浅说预设[J].重庆工学院学报,2005,19(4):99-101. 被引量:11
  • 3王宏军,洪军.用语用推理模式论析预设、衍推、含意与断言[J].重庆交通大学学报(社会科学版),2007,7(3):116-119. 被引量:1
  • 4Michael Brady & Duncan Pritchard, "Epistemological Contextualist : Problems and Prospects", The Philosophical Quarterly 2005 (55) ,p. 161 ,p. 166.
  • 5Fred Dretske, "Epistemic Operators", Journal of Philosophy, 1970 (67), pp. 1007 - 1023.
  • 6Robert Nozick,Philosophical Explanations, Harvard University Press, 1981, Chapter 3.
  • 7See especially Keith DeRose," Solving the Skeptical Problem" , Philosophical Review, 1995 (104), pp. 2 -3; Stewart Cohen, "Contextualism, Skepticism, and the Structure of Reasons", Philosophical Perspectives, 1999 ( 13 ), p. 63.
  • 8Stewart Cohen," Contextualism, Skepticism, and the Structure of Reasons", Philosophical Perspectives, 1999(13),p. 63, p. 63, p. 65, p. 58, p. 60, p. 61, p. 86, p. 36.
  • 9Keith DeRose, "Contextualism and Knowledge Attributions", Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 1992 ( 52 ), p. 1.
  • 10Keith DeRose, "Solving the Skeptical Problem", Philosophical Review, 1995 ( 104 ), p. 37.

引证文献3

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部