期刊文献+

可塑纤维桩修复对根管治疗牙抗折强度的影响 被引量:8

Fracture resistance and failure modes of endodontically treated human teeth restored with four different post-core systems
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较不同桩修复离体牙对修复体整体抗折强度的影响。方法将32颗上颌前磨牙行根管治疗并从唇侧釉牙骨质界上2mm处截断后随机分为4组,A组采用镍铬金属铸造桩核加铸造冠修复,B组采用Tenax Fiber White纤维桩、树脂核加铸造冠修复,C组采用EverStick可塑纤维桩单根(直径1.5mm)、树脂核加铸造冠修复,D组采用EverStick可塑纤维桩双根(直径1.5mm和1.2mm)、树脂核加铸造冠修复。所有离体牙均由自凝树脂包埋,电子万能试验机加载头与牙体长轴成45°,以1mm/min的加载速度加载直至试件任何部分折裂,记录读数并观察修复体折裂模式。结果A、B、C、D组间修复体的整体抗折强度差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。各纤维桩组牙体折裂位置较铸造桩更接近牙颈部。结论尽管可塑纤维桩自身的弯曲强度较低,但是修复离体牙后整体抗折强度较高,可以满足临床要求。各纤维桩组折裂模式较铸造桩组更有利于修复体失败后的再修复。 Objective To compare the fracture resistance and failure modes of endodontically treated human upper premolars restored with different post-core systems. Methods 32 extracted human upper premolars were endodontically treated and crowns were sectioned at 2 mm above the labial cement enamel junction (CEJ). The teeth were randomly and equally divided into 4 groups: Group A, teeth restored with cast metal post and metal crown; group B, Tenax Fiber White fiber post and metal crown; group C, EverStick fiber post 1.5 mm in diameter and metal crown; group D, EverStick fiber post 1.5 mm in diameter and add another 1.2 mm diameter EverStick fiber post and metal crown. All the teeth were embedded in acrylic resin blocks, and were subjected to a compressive load at 1 mm/min crosshead speed which delivered at a 45° to the long axis until the first sign of failure was noted. The fracture load and the mode of fracture were recorded. Results Fracture resistances of the four groups of restored teeth were not significantly different (P〉0.05). However, fracture modes in fiber post groups were nearer to CEJ than cast metal post group. Conclusion Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with Ever- Stick fiber post is enhanced that it can meet the clinical need, although the flexural resistance of EverStick fiber post itself is the weakest. Fracture modes of all fiber post groups are more favorable than cast metal post group.
出处 《华西口腔医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2008年第6期633-635,639,共4页 West China Journal of Stomatology
基金 广西科学研究与技术开发计划基金资助项目(桂科攻0719006-2-20)
关键词 纤维桩 桩核修复 抗折强度 折裂模式 fiber post post and core restoration fracture resistance fracture mode
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1朱智敏,卿海.纤维树脂桩核的临床应用[J].实用医院临床杂志,2007,4(2):13-15. 被引量:12
  • 2Lassila LV, Tanner J, Le Bell AM, et al. Flexural properties of fiber reinforced root canal posts[J]. Dent Mater, 2004, 20 (1):29- 36.
  • 3Lassila LV, Tezvergil A, Lahdenpera M, et al. Evaluation of some properties of two fiber-reinforced composite materials [J]. Acta Odontol Scand, 2005, 63 (4) : 196-204.
  • 4Cagidiaco MC, Radovic I, Simonetti M, et al. Clinical performance of fiber post restorations in endodontically treated teeth: 2-year results[J]. Int J Prosthodont, 2007, 20(3): 293-298.
  • 5Turker SB, Alkumru HN, Evren B. Prospective clinical trial of polyethylene fiber ribbon-reinforced, resin composite post-core buildup restorations[J]. Int J Prosthodont, 2007, 20(1):55-56.
  • 6Mannocci F, Sherriff M, Watson TF, et al. Penetration of bonding resins into fibre-reinforced composite posts: A confocal microscopic study[J]. Int Endod J, 2005, 38(1):46-51.
  • 7唐高妍,巢永烈,文志红,樊瑜波.四种桩材料对牙本质应力分布影响的三维有限元分析[J].华西口腔医学杂志,1998,16(3):259-262. 被引量:60
  • 8Fokkinga WA, Kreulen CM, Vallittu PK, et al. A structured analysis of in vitro failure loads and failure modes of fiber, metal, and ceramic post-and-core systems[J]. Int J Prosthodont, 2004, 17 (4) : 476-482.

二级参考文献17

  • 1[1]Morgano SM,Brackett SE.Foundation restorations in fixed prosthodontics:current knowledge and future needs[J].J Prosthet Dent,1999,82:643-657.
  • 2[2]Gutmann JL.The dentin-root complex:anatomic and biologic considerations in restoring endodontically treated teeth[J].J Prosthet Dent,1992,67:458-467.
  • 3[3]Harvey TE,White JT,Leeb IJ.Lateral condensation stress in root canals[J].J Endod,1981,7:151-157.
  • 4[4]Rud J,Omnell KA.Root fractures due to corrosion[J].Scand J Dent Res,1970,78:397-403.
  • 5[5]King PA,Setchell DJ.An in vitro evaluation of a prototype CFRC prefabricated post developed for the restoration of pulpless teeth[J].J Oral Rehabil,1990,17:599-609.
  • 6[6]Pegoretti A,Fambri L,Zappini G,et al.Finite element analysis of a glass fibre reinforced composite endodontic post[J].Biomaterials,2002,23:2667 -2682.
  • 7[7]Fredriksson M,Astback J,Pamenius M,et al.A retrospective study on 236 patients with teeth restored by carbon fiber-reinforced epoxy resin posts[J].J Prosthet Dent,1998,80:151-157.
  • 8[8]Ferrari M,Vichi A,García-Godoy F.A retrospective study of fiber-reinforced epoxy resin posts vs.cast posts and cores:a four year recall[J].Am J Dent,2000b,13:B9-B14.
  • 9[9]Saupe WA,Gluskin AH,Radke RA Jr.A comparative study of fracture resistance between morphologic dowel and cores and a resin-reinforced dowel system in the intraradicular restoration of structurally compromised roots[J].Quintessence Int,1996,27:483-491.
  • 10[10]Rosentritt M,Furer C,Behr M,et al.Comparison of in vitro fracture strength of metallic and tooth-coloured posts and cores[J].J Oral Rehabil,2000,27:595-601.

共引文献70

同被引文献72

引证文献8

二级引证文献36

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部