期刊文献+

涨跌幅限制:是否稳定了股票市场?--基于GARCH事件模型的实证检验 被引量:2

Price Limits:Stabilize or Destabilize the Markets?——Direct Test Based on the GARCH-Event Model
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文应用GARCH事件模型对涨跌幅限制政策实施前后市场波动的结构性变化进行了实证检验。研究发现,涨跌幅限制政策对我国股市的波动性具有一定的抑制作用,但是非常有限,同时,涨跌幅对A股市场和B股市场波动性的影响相反。因此,涨跌幅限制并没有如预期的那样发挥比较大的稳定作用,应该适当修正或放宽该政策。 Price limit policy had been implemented in 1999 to stabilize the market. How about the effection of this policy? We try to analysis the effection of the policy with the GARCH model. We found that the policy exerts good influence to the stability of the stock market, on the long range, the policy reduced the instability about 13 percent, however elevated instability of the B market about 8 percent. The policy had not exerted the anticipated effection, so it should be corrected rightly.
出处 《金融发展研究》 2009年第1期60-63,共4页 Journal Of Financial Development Research
关键词 涨跌幅限制 市场波动 GARCH事件模型 Price limit, Market fluctuation, GARCH model
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献29

  • 1穆启国,刘海龙,吴冲锋.涨跌幅限制与股票价格行为分析[J].管理科学学报,2004,7(3):23-30. 被引量:11
  • 2Lee C M C, Ready M J, Seguin P J. Volume ,volatility, and New York Stock Exchange trading halts[J]. Journal of Finance, 1994,49(1):183-214.
  • 3Subrahmanyam A. Circuit breakers and market volatility: A theoretical perspective [J]. Journal of Finance, 1994,49(1): 237-254.
  • 4Harris L E. Circuit breakers and program trading limits: What have we learned? [R]. Working paper,University of Southern California, 1997.
  • 5Cho D D, Russell J, Tiao G C, et al. The magnet effect of price limits: evidence from high-frequence data on Taiwan Stock Exchange[J]. Journal of Empirical Finance, 2003, 10(1):133-168.
  • 6Schwert G W. Stock volatility and the crash of 87 [J]. The Review of Financial Studies, 1990,3(1):77-102.
  • 7Dainel K, David H, Subrahmangam A. A theory of overconfidence, self-attribution, and security market under-and overreactions [J]. Journal of Finance,1998,53 (3) : 1839- 1886.
  • 8Greenwald B C, Stein J C. Transaction risk, market crashes, and the role of circuit breakers[J]. Journal of Business, 1991,64(2) :443-462.
  • 9Blume M E, MacKinlay A C, Terker B. Order imbalances and stock price movement on October 19 and 20, 1987[J].Journal of Finance, 1989, 44(2):827-848.
  • 10Ma CK, RaoRP, SearsRS. Limit moves and price resolution: The case of the treasury bond futures market[J]. Journal of Futures Markets, 1989, 9(2):321-335.

共引文献30

同被引文献17

  • 1刘海龙,吴文锋,吴冲锋.涨跌幅限制对股票市场波动性的影响[J].上海交通大学学报,2005,39(10):1569-1573. 被引量:12
  • 2屈文洲.交易制度对中国股票市场效率的影响——基于涨跌幅限制的实证研究[J].厦门大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2007,57(3):40-47. 被引量:20
  • 3Bollerslev and Tim, 1986, "Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity", Journal of Econometrics, 31, pp. 307-327.
  • 4D. B. Nelson, 1991, "Conditional Heteroskedasticity in Asset Returns: A New Approach", Econometrica, 59, pp. 347-370.
  • 5Glosten, L. R., Jagannathan and D. Runkle, 1993, "On the Relation between the Expected Value and the Volatility of Normal Excess Return on Stocks", Journal of Finance, 48, pp. 1779-1801.
  • 6James W. Taylor., 2004, "Volatility Forecasting with Smooth Transition Exponential Smoothing", International Journal of Forecasting, 20, pp. 273-286.
  • 7J. S. Dagpunar, 2007, Simulation and Monte Carlo With applications in nance and MCMC, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. pp. 1-15.
  • 8Kahneman and Tversky, 1979, "Prospect theory: an analysis of decision making under risk", Econometrics, 49, pp. 263-291.
  • 9Zakoian, J. M., 1994, "Threshold Heteroskedastic Models", Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 18, pp. 931-944.
  • 10陈浩武,杨朝军,范利民.中国证券市场涨跌幅限制的磁力效应研究--兼论适当放宽涨停限制的合理性[J].管理科学学报,2008,11(5):120-128. 被引量:20

引证文献2

二级引证文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部