从陕西“周老虎”想到广州“麦船台”——评麦英豪的“广州秦汉考古三大发现”

From "Tiger Zhou" in Shanxi Province to "Shipway Mai" in Guangzhou——Review of the Three Discoveries for Qin & Han Dynasty in Guangzhou by Mr.Mai Yinghao

以陕西"周老虎"做比较,指出广州"麦船台"同为假点。上世纪70年代麦英豪定性的"秦汉造船工场遗址",30多年来始终得不到造船工程界和船史学界的认同,地理和地质学界认为这里并不存在造船和下水的条件,建筑工程和建筑考古学界则以大量出土文物证实其为南越王宫苑遗址。被国务院确定为国家重点文物保护单位的"秦造船工场遗址"既无保护,又无展出,也没有专著出版,在全国的学术界出现一片质疑和遣责声。这是麦英豪以排他性的专家"鉴研会"排斥多学科的全国性学术研讨会。文中呼吁麦英豪应正视现实,修正失误,广州的文物部门领导也应当检讨不作为的过失。

Tiger Zhou in Shanxi province and Mai shipway in Guangzhou has no relation at all, however there is one point in common： both of them are fake. Mr. Mai Yinghao hastily claimed the ＂relic of shipbuilding site in Qin ＆ Han Dynasty＂ in 1970s, and later changed it to the ＂relic of shipbuilding site in Qin Dynasty＂ which has not been accepted by shipbuilding engineering and ship history research field for more than 30 years. Researchers in geology and geography also disagreed on the site suitable for shipbuilding or launching in that area. On the other hand from views in architecture and historical architecture, it is regarded as a relic of palace for Nanyue Kingdom Palace with lots of cultural relics. Actually, those materials which are called ＂wooden supporters＂ and ＂slipway＂ are the pillars and basis for the palace. Now ＂Mai shipway＂, national key site of cultural relic＇s protection designated by State Department, where there is no protection, no exhibition and no publications, is condemned in nationwide academic field. The reason is that the isolated workshop organized by Mr.Mai Yinghao prevents the nationwide academic workshop of multiple disciplines. Finally, Mr Mai Yinghao should face honestly to history and correct his mistakes, and the related officers in Guangzhou cultural relic department should regret for their dereliction as well.