专利重复授权问题的司法实践

ludicial Practice in Respect of Issue of Double Patenting

2008年7月，最高人民法院对其提审的曾引起很大争议的舒学章诉专列复审委员会案（简称舒学章案）作出最终判决，撤销了北京市高级人民法院原终审判决，维持了北京市第一中级人民法院的一审判决和专利复审委员会的审查决定。在该判决中，最高人民法院就备受争议和关注的涉及重复授权的两个主要问题作出回应，由此也再次引发了对於重复授权问题的讨论热潮。

In July 2008, the Supreme People＇s Court made the final ruling in its review of the case of great controversy, Shu Xuezhang v. Patent Reexamination Board （Shu Xuzhang case for short）, reversing the former judgement made by the Beijing Higher People＇s Court and upholding the first-instance judgment made by the Beijing No.1 Intermediate People＇s Court and the examination decision made by the Patent Reexamination Board. The Supreme People＇s Court addressed two major issues of double patenting, which were heatedly debated on and drew great attention？ This judgment again triggered heated discussion on the issue of double patenting