3Schwab J M, Chiang N, Arita M, et al. Resolvin El and protectin D1 activate inflammation-resolution programmes[J]. Nature, 2009, 447(13): 869-874.
4Linde F. The effect of different storage methods on the mechanical properties of trabecular bone[J]. J. Biomech, 1993, 10: 1249-1252.
5Snyder S M, Schneider E. Estimation of mechanical properties of cortical bone by computed tomography [J]. JOrthop. Res., 1991, 9: 422-431.
6Lotz J C. Mechanical properties of tralaeeular hone from the proximal femur: a quantitative CT study [J]. JComput Assist Tomogr, 1990, 14(1): 108.
7Keaveny T M, Borchers R E. Trabecular bone modulus and strength can depend on specimen geometry[J]. J Biomech, 1993, 26(8): 991-1000.
8Helgason B, Perilli E, Schileo E, et al. Mathematical relationships between bone density and mechanical properties: a literature review [J]. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon), 2008, 23(2): 135 146.
9Harrigan T P, Jasty M, Mann R W, et al. Limitations of the continuum assumption in cancellous bone[J]. J Biomeeh, 1988: 269-275.
10Garrison J G, Slahoch C L. have greater effects on the bone than damage[J]. Bone, Density and architecture toughness of trabecular 2009, 44(5): 924-9.
