期刊文献+

慢性移植肾肾病肾组织中转化生长因子β_1、金属蛋白酶2、金属蛋白酶组织抑制剂1的表达及意义 被引量:2

Expression and significance of transforming growth factor-beta 1,matrix metalloproteinase-2 and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1 in the renal tissue of patients with chronic allograft nephropathy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 背景:相关实验表明,转化生长因子β1、金属蛋白酶2和金属蛋白酶组织抑制剂1在慢性移植肾肾病中发挥着重要作用,但发病机制尚不十分明确。目的:探讨转化生长因子β1、金属蛋白酶2和金属蛋白酶组织抑制剂1在慢性移植肾肾病患者肾组织及正常肾组织中的表达及意义。设计、时间及地点:细胞组织形态对照观察实验,于2008-06/10在福建漳州解放军第一七五医院病理实验室完成。材料:24例慢性移植肾肾病患者的移植肾组织,10例正常肾组织做对照。方法:34例参试者肾组织标本均进行免疫组织化学染色:常规甲醛固定,石蜡包埋,切成厚3μm的切片,正常非免疫性血清封闭,依次加一抗、二抗及SP复合物,DAB显色,苏木精复染,透明封固。主要观察指标:免疫组织化学染色观察34例肾组织标本的转化生长因子β1、金属蛋白酶2和金属蛋白酶组织抑制剂1的表达情况,并分析3者间及与慢性移植肾肾病病理分级之间的相互关系。结果:定性分析:在移植肾肾病的肾组织中转化生长因子β1、金属蛋白酶2和金属蛋白酶组织抑制剂1在肾小管上皮细胞胞浆和胞膜多呈强阳性表达。定量分析:转化生长因子β1、金属蛋白酶组织抑制剂1、金属蛋白酶2在正常组和慢性移植肾肾病组间的表达有显著差异(P<0.01),且转化生长因子β1、金属蛋白酶组织抑制剂1的表达随慢性移植肾肾病的病理分级的增加而增加,而金属蛋白酶2则略有下降趋势。同时转化生长因子β1和金属蛋白酶组织抑制剂1的表达之间呈正相关(r=0.651,P<0.05)。结论:转化生长因子β1、金属蛋白酶2、金属蛋白酶组织抑制剂1的表达异常是慢性移植肾肾病的重要表现,转化生长因子β1可能通过上调金属蛋白酶组织抑制剂1的表达从而抑制细胞外基质的降解引起移植肾纤维化。 BACKGROUND: Previous experiments have shown that transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1), matrix metalloproteinase-2 (MMP-2) and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1 (TIMP-1) play an important role in chronic allograft nephropathy, but the mechanisms remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the expression and significance of TGF-β1, MMP-2 and TIMP-1 in the renal tissues of chronic allograft nephropathy and normal renal tissues. DESIGN, TIME AND SETTING: A histological and morphological control observational experiment of cytology was performed at Pathological Laboratory of the 175lh hospital from June to October 2008. PARTICIPANTS: The transplanted renal tissues extracted from 24 patients with chronic allograft nephropathy were used in the experiment, and the normal renal tissues in 10 patients were assigned as controls. METHODS: Immunohistochemical staining was performed in all the renal tissues. All the renal tissues were fixed with formaldehyde and embedded by paraffin wax. Then the sections were prepared with a thickness of 3 μm, and were then closed with normal non-immune serum. Subsequently, the sections were incubated as follows: primary antibody, secondary antibody, streptavidin peroxidase complex, and diaminobenzidine (DAB), followed by HE counterstaining. The sections were cleared and coverslipped. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The expressions of TGF-β1, MMP-2 and TIMP-1 in the renal tissues were observed by immunohistochemical staining. The relationships among TGF-β1, MMP-2 and TIMP-1, as well as between them and the grade of chronic allograft nephropathy were analyzed. RESULTS: Qualitative analysis: The TGF-β1, MMP-2 and TIMP-1 showed strongly positive expressions in the cytoplasm and membrane of renal tubular epithelial cells in transplanted renal tissues. Quantitative analysis: There were significant differences in expression of TGF-β1, MMP-2 and TIMP-1 between in transplanted renal tissues and in normal renal tissues (P〈 0.01). As the grade of chronic allograft nephropathy increasing, the expressions of TGF-β1 and TIMP-1 increased, while the expression of MMP-2 had a slight decreasing tendency. There was a positive correlation between the expressions of TIMP-1 and TGF-β1 (r =0.651, P 〈 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Abnormal expressions of TGF-β1, MMP-2 and TIMP-1 are important manifestations of chronic allograft nephropathy. TGF-β1 has a fibrogenic action by indirectly inhibiting extracellular matrix degradation via upregulation of TIMP-1.
出处 《中国组织工程研究与临床康复》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2009年第5期821-824,共4页 Journal of Clinical Rehabilitative Tissue Engineering Research
基金 福建省自然科学基金资助项目(2006J0388)~~
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献34

共引文献9

同被引文献30

  • 1邹万忠.我国肾脏病理学的现状和未来[J].中华病理学杂志,2005,34(8):496-499. 被引量:6
  • 2杨俊伟,黎磊石.移植肾病理学及与临床的关系[J].肾脏病与透析肾移植杂志,1996,5(5):81-87. 被引量:4
  • 3Solez K, Colvin RB, Racusen LC,et al. Banff 07 Classification of Renal Allograft Pathology:Updates and Future Directions[J]. American Journal of Transplantation, 2008, 8(4) : 753-760.
  • 4Magil AB,Tinckam KJ. Focal peritubular capillary C4d deposition in acute rejection [J]. Nephrol Dial Transplant, 2006, 21 (5): 1382 1388.
  • 5Kedainis RL, Koch MJ,Brennan DC,et al. Focal C4d+ in renal allografts is associated with the presence of donor-specific antibodies and decreased allograft survival[J]. Am J Transplant,2009,9 (4) :812-819.
  • 6Yoon HE, Kim SH, Kim JY, et al. Clinical significance Of C4d deposition in stable renal allografts in the early post-transplantation period[J]. Clin Transplant,2009, 23(6):812-818.
  • 7Molne J, Nyberg G, Blohme I,et al. Gtomerular C3c deposition and intravascular macrophage accumulation in early humoral renal allograft rejection signifies a poor short-term outcome [J]. AP MIS,2006,114(10) :700-711.
  • 8Kuypers DR, Lerut E, Evenepoel P, et al. C3D deposition in pefitubular capillaries indicatesa variant of acute renal allograft rejection characterized by a worse clinical outcome[J]. Transplantation,2003,76(1) :102-108.
  • 9Haas M,Rahman MH,Racusen LC,etal. C4d and C3d staining in biopsies of ABO- and HLA incompatible renal allografts: correlation with histologic findings[J]. American Journal of Transplantation,2006,6(8) : 1829-1840.
  • 10Sarwal M, Chua MS, Kambham N, et al. Molecular heterogeneity in acute renal allograft rejection identified by DNA microarray profiling[J]. N Engl J Med,2003,349(2):125-138.

引证文献2

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部