期刊文献+

低位前切除术与腹会阴联合切除术治疗中低位直肠癌85例 被引量:1

Clinical Comparision of Two Operative Methods of Adenocarcinoma of Middle/Low Rectum
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨低位前切除术(LAR)与腹会阴联合切除术(APR)对中低位直肠癌预后的影响。方法:分析2000年7月至2007年7月我院收治的85例中低位直肠癌患者的临床资料。结果:LAR组和APR组患者预后差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);85例中无手术死亡病例。结论:LAR和APR手术方式对低位直肠癌的预后无明显影响。保肛术式为首选,因此APR应视为首选术式。 Objective :To evaluate the effect of low anterior resection (LAR) and abdominoperineal resction (APR) on the prognosis of patient with middle/low rectal carcinoma. Methods: 85 patients with tumor located less than 7 cm above the anal verge were investigated. Results: 85 patients were not death attributing to operation. There was no stastistic difference on the prognosis between LAR group and APR group ( P 〉 0. 05 ). Conclusion : Operation with anna/ sphincter preservation is the first choice in most mid/low rectal cancer patients. APR may be the best operative method.
作者 李长华
出处 《现代临床医学》 2009年第1期61-62,共2页 Journal of Modern Clinical Medicine
关键词 中低位直肠癌 手术方式 保肛 middle/low rectal neoplasm method of operation sphincter preservation
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献31

共引文献27

同被引文献27

  • 1李辰生,万德森,潘志忠,周志伟,陈功,伍小军,李力人,卢震海,丁培荣,李勇.影响中下段直肠癌患者根治术后生存的多因素分析[J].癌症,2006,25(5):587-590. 被引量:15
  • 2Varpe P, Huhtinen H, Rantala A, Salminen P, Rautava P, Hurme S, GrOnroos J. Quality of life after surgery for rectal cancer with special refer- ence to pelvic floor dysfunction. Colorectal Dis 2011; 13:399-405 [PMID: 20041930 DOI: 10.1111/ j.1463-1318.2009.02165.x].
  • 3Bujko K, Rutkowski A, Chang GJ, Michalski W, Chrnielik E, Kusnierz J. Is the 1-cm Rule of Distal Bowel Resection Margin in Rectal' Cancer Based on Clinical Evidence? A Systematic Review. Indian J Surg Oncol 2012; 3:139-146 [PMID: 23728157 DOI: 10.:007/s13193-012-0158-y].
  • 4Schoetz DJ. Evolving practice patterns in colon and rectal surgery. J Am Coll Surg 2006; 203:322-327 [PMID: 16931304 DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.0 5.302].
  • 5Perry WB, Connaughton JC. Abdominoperineal resection: how is it done and what are the results? Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2007; 20:213-220 [PMID: 20011202 DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-984865].
  • 6Nagtegaal ID, van de Velde CJ, Marijnen CA, van Krieken JH, Quirke P. Low rectal cancer: a call for a change of approach in abdominoperineal resection. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23:9257-9264 [PMID: 16361623 DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.02.9231].
  • 7Shihab OC, Brown G, Daniels IR, Heald RJ, Quirke P, Moran BJ. Patients with low rectal cancer treated by abdominoperineal excision have worse tumors and higher involved margin rates compared with patients treated by anterior resection. Dis Colon Rec- tum 2010; 53:53-56 [PMID: 20010351 DOI: 10.1007/ DCR.0b013e3181c70465].
  • 8Chambers W, Khan A, Waters R, Lindsey I, George B, Mortensen N, Cunningham C. Examination of outcome following abdominoperineal resection for adenocarcinoma in Oxford. Colorectal Dis 2010; 12:1192-1197 [PMID: 19519690 DOI: 10.1111/ j.1463-1318.2009.01939.x].
  • 9Marr R, Birbeck K, Garvican J, Macklin CP, Tiffin NJ, Parsons WJ, Dixon MF, Mapstone NP, Sebag- Montefiore D, Scott N, Johnston D, Sagar P, Finan P, Quirke P. The modem abdominoperineal excision: the next challenge after total mesorectal excision. Ann Surg 2005; 242:74-82 [PMID: 15973104 DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000167926.60908.15].
  • 10Campos-Lobato LF, Alves-Ferreira PC, Lavery IC,Kiran RP. Abdominoperineal resection does not de- crease quality of life in patients with low rectal can- cer. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 2011; 66:1035-1040 [PMID: 21808871 DOI: 10.1590/S1807-59322011000600019].

引证文献1

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部