期刊文献+

中国行政法发展的宪法学解读 被引量:6

Interpreting to the Constitution Science of the Development of the Chinese Administration Law
下载PDF
导出
摘要 改革开放三十年来,行政法得到了长足的发展,行政法发展中出现的新的现象和当前转型时期的中国行政法学的困境的解决迫切需要宪法学提供支持。目前学界对宪法与行政法关系定位存在的局限性源于对宪法定位的局限性。宪法是组织共同体的规则,是动态的人类共同体的生活方式,是法律世界的世界观和方法论,它既不是公法也不是私法或者它既是公法又是私法。行政法的理论基础的重新定位、行政法的"疆域"的动态发展、行政主体的多样化、行政方式的多样化和行政法治的发展都需要宪法内涵的更新和宪法学的解读。 For the 30 years after the reformation and opening to the outside world, the administration Law in China has been improved greatly. The solving of the new phenomenon occurring in the development of the administration law and the dilemma of the Chinese administration law occurring during the converting period needs urgently the support provided by the constitution science. Now in the academic field, the limitation concerning the relation orientation between constitution and administration law originates in the orientation of the constitution. Constitution is the rules shaping the community, a living mechanism guiding the dynamic human community and the reflection of the world outlook and methodology of the legal field. The constitution is neither a public law, nor a private law or in the other word it is either the public law or the private law. The re-orientation of theoretic basis about the administration law, the "boundary" of the dynamic development of the administration, the diversification of the administrative subject and means, the development of the administrative politics all need the renewal of the constitution connotation and the interpretation of the constitution science.
出处 《江汉大学学报(社会科学版)》 2009年第1期50-54,共5页 Journal of Jianghan University(Social Science Edition)
关键词 行政法 宪法 共同体 administration law constitution community
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献17

  • 1李龙,汪习根.宪政规律论[J].中国法学,1999(4):33-46. 被引量:48
  • 2陈瑞华.二十世纪中国之刑事诉讼法学[J].中外法学,1997,9(6):1-23. 被引量:18
  • 3孙国华,杨思斌.公私法的划分与法的内在结构[J].法制与社会发展,2004,10(4):100-109. 被引量:81
  • 4刘茂林.宪法究竟是什么[J].中国法学,2002(6):21-23. 被引量:52
  • 5[2][英]洛克林.公法与政治理论[M].郑戈译.北京:商务印书馆,2002:8.
  • 6[3][法]笛卡尔.笛卡尔思辨哲学[M].尚新建等译.北京:九州出版社,2004:2.
  • 7[11]Dvaid Dyzenhaus,The Unity of Public Law[M].Oxford and Portland Oregon 2004:1.
  • 8[14]Charles Forcey,he Crossroads of Liberalism; Croly,Weyl,Lippmann,and he Progressive Era.1900-1925[M].Oxford University Press,1972:139.
  • 9[德]考夫曼.法律哲学[M].北京:法律出版社,2004..
  • 10.《马克思恩格斯全集》第46卷(下)[M].人民出版社,1980年版.第35页.

共引文献190

同被引文献61

引证文献6

二级引证文献19

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部