期刊文献+

广东甘蔗品种遗传多样性的AFLP分析 被引量:9

AFLP Analysis of Genetic Diversity in Sugarcane Varieties in Guangdong Province
下载PDF
导出
摘要 采用15对多态性较好的AFLP引物对广东育成的41个甘蔗品种的遗传多样性进行分析。结果表明:每对引物的多态性位点平均为61.5,多态性位点百分率为77.40%。41个甘蔗品种间的遗传相似系数为0.5210~0.9211,平均为0.6842,遗传多样性属中等水平。聚类分析把41个品种分为2大类,在系谱中亲缘关系密切的大多数品种,如粤农81-762与粤农85-1285和粤农86-295,粤糖57-423与粤糖85-5和粤糖85-177等都能分别聚在一起。但也有例外,如粤糖83-251和粤糖83-271,都是CP72-1210×华南56-12组合的后代,但没有归为同一类。遗传多样性指数分析显示,不同年代的品种多样性指数差异明显,最高是80年代,为0.3072,最低是60年代,为0.1162;不同单位选育的品种遗传多样性指数变化不大,为0.2756~0.3061。加强新种质利用是有效提高甘蔗品种遗传多样性的重要措施。 The genetic diversity of 41 sugarcane varieties bred in Guangdong Province was studied using 15 AFLP primer pairs. The results showed that the average polymorphic loci per primer pair were 61.5, and the percentage of polymorphism loci was 77.40%. The genetic similarity indexes of 41 varieties ranged from 0.5210 to 0.9211, with an average of 0.6842, which implied that the genetic diversity among the varieties was at middle level. The 41 varieties were clustered into two groups. Most of the varieties with close relationship in family-tree could be clustered into the same groups, such as YN81-762, YN85-1285 and YN86-295, as well as YT57-423, YT85-5 and YT85-177, but some varieties could not, such as YT83-251and YT83-271 which derived from the same cross "CP72-1210 × Huanan 56-12 " The varieties selected at different periods showed remarkable differences in genetic diversity index (GDI). The varieties selected in 1980s were found to be the highest (GDI = 0.3072), and the 1960s the lowest (GDI =0.1162). GDI of varieties from different Institutes revealed a little bit difference, but still kept in unremarkable level (from 0.2756 to 0.3061). The result indicated the genetic diversity would be increased by using new sources from sugarcane germplasm.
出处 《热带亚热带植物学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2009年第1期43-48,共6页 Journal of Tropical and Subtropical Botany
基金 广东省自然科学基金项目(04001458) 国家863计划项目(2007AA100701) 农业部948项目(2006-G37)资助
关键词 甘蔗 品种 AFLP 遗传多样性 Sugarcane Variety AFLP Genetic diversity
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Arceneaux G. Cultivated sugarcane of the world and theh- botanical derivation [J]. Proc Int Soc Sugar Cane Techn, 1965, 12: 844-854.
  • 2Glaszmann J C, Dufour P, Grivet L, et al. Comparative genome analysis between several tropical grasses [J]. Euphytica, 1997, 96: 13-21.
  • 3da Silva J, Sorrells M E, Burnquist W L, et al. RFLP linkage map and genome analysis of Saccharum sponteum [J]. Genome, 1993, 36: 782-791.
  • 4Bessel P, Taylor G, Carroll B, et ak Assessing genetic diversity in a sugarcane germplasm collection using an automated AFLP analysis [J]. Genetica, 1998, 104: 143-153.
  • 5Harvey H, Huckett B I, Botha F C. Use of polymerase chain reaction and random amplification of polymorphic DNAs for the determination of genetic distances between 21 sugarcane varieties [J]. Proc South Afr Sugar Techn Assoc, 1994, 4: 36-40.
  • 6Nair N V, Selvi A, Sreenivasan T V, et al. Molecular diversity ha Indian sugarcane cultivars as revealed by randomly amplified DNA polymorphisms [J]. Euphytica, 2002, 127: 219-225.
  • 7Lima M L A, Garcia A A F, Oliveira K M, et al. Analysis of genetic similarity detected by AFLP and coefficient of parentage among genotypes of sugar cane (Saccharum spp.) [J]. Theor Appl Genet, 2002, 104: 30-38.
  • 8Besse P, McIntyre C L, Berding N. Ribosomal DNA variations in Erianthus, a wild sugarcane relative (Andropogoneae - Saccharinae) [J]. Theor Appl Genet, 1996, 92: 733-743.
  • 9劳方业,刘睿,何慧怡,邓海华,陈仲华,陈健文,符成,张垂明,杨业后.崖城系列甘蔗亲本遗传多样性的AFLP标记分析[J].分子植物育种,2008,6(3):517-522. 被引量:29
  • 10王英,庄南生,高和琼,黄东益.甘蔗种质遗传基础的ISSR分析[J].湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版),2007,33(S1):176-183. 被引量:26

二级参考文献46

共引文献71

同被引文献147

引证文献9

二级引证文献28

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部