期刊文献+

LASIK手术前后视功能的对比研究 被引量:1

Comparative study of myopic visual functions before and after laser in situ keratomileusis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的观察LASIK手术前、后患者视功能的变化,探讨屈光手术本身对屈光不正者视功能是否有影响。方法随机选取LASIK手术33例患者,采用视功能检测软件对患者手术前、后的视功能进行采集(视觉噪声、位置噪声、轮廓整合),分别进行配对t检验以了解LASIK手术本身是否对患者的这3项视功能产生影响。结果视觉噪声:LASIK术前(9.12±0.71),术后(9.03±0.82),差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);位置辨别:术前(5.56±1.76),术后(5.82±1.64),差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);轮廓整合:术前(4.27±0.76),术后(4.74±0.44),差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论LASIK手术对近视患者高级视功能中的视觉噪声、位置噪声无影响,但是对轮廓整合能力有改善作用。 Objective To investigate the change of myopic visual functions before and after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK), study whether refractive surgery have effect on visual functions of myopes. Methods Thirty three subjects were randomly chosen and three types of visual functions were assessed by application of software, such as visual noise, orienfion discrimination and contour integration. Then all datum were analyzed by paired t-test to study whether LASIK have effect on the patients' visual functions. Results There were no significant differences between pre-LASIK (9.12±0.71,5.56±1.76) and post-LASIK (9.03±0.82,5.82±1. 64) in visual noise and orientation discrimination ( P 〉 0.05 ), and significant differences were shew pre-LASIK ( 4.27±0.76 ) and post-LASIK (4.74±0.44) in contour integration ( P 〈 0.01 ) .Conclusion No obvious changes were found in visual noise and orientation discrimination before and after LASIK, but LASIK could improve the contour integration of myopes.
作者 黄荣海
出处 《广西医学》 CAS 2009年第1期10-11,共2页 Guangxi Medical Journal
基金 广西医疗卫生科学研究基金(桂卫重200730)
关键词 近视 准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术 视觉噪声 位置噪声 轮廓整合 Myopia Visual noise Orientation discrimination Contour integration
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献14

  • 1Sandoral HP, Castro LE, Vroman DT, et al. Refractive surgery Survey 2004. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2005,31: 221-233.
  • 2Duffey RJ, Leaming D. US trend in Refractive Surgery: 2003 ISRS/AAO survey. J Refract Surg, 2005,21:87-91.
  • 3Hammond MD, Madigan WP, Bower KS Refractive Surgery in the United States Army, 2000-2003. Ophthalmology, 2005,112:184-190.
  • 4Pesudovs K, Garamendi E, Elliott DB. The quality of life impact of refractive correction (DIRC) Questionnaire: Development and validation. Optom Vis Sci, 2004,81:769-777.
  • 5Kanjani N, Jacob S, Agarwal Am, et al. Wavefront-and topography-guided ablation in myopic eyes using Zyoptix. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2004, 30: 398-402.
  • 6Kohnen T, Buhren J, Kuhne C, et al. Wavefront-guided LASIK with the Zyoptix 3. 1 system for the correction of myopia and compound myopic astigmatism with 1-year follow-up: Clinical outcome and change in higher order aberration. Ophthalmology,2004,12:2175-2185.
  • 7Kaiserman I, Hazarbassanov H, Varssano D, et al. Contrast sensitivity after wave front-guided LASIK. Ophthalmology, 2004,111:454 -457.
  • 8Phusitphoykai N, Tungsiripat T, Siriboonkroom J, et al.Comparison of conventional versus wavofront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis in the same patient. J Befract Surg,2003,19: 217-220.
  • 9Kuang-mon Ashley Tuan OD, PhD. Visual experience and patient satisfaction with wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg,2006,32 : 577-583.
  • 10Baymond A. Applegate, Jason D. Marsack, Roberto Ramos et al.Interaction between aberrations to improve or reduce visual performance. J Cataract Befract Surg, 2003, 29: 1487-1495.

共引文献65

同被引文献4

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部