期刊文献+

“从而”、“因而”的功能差异及其历时解释 被引量:11

The Functional Differences between "Cong'er" and "Yin'er"
下载PDF
导出
摘要 "从而"、"因而"在语义、句法功能上存在差异,"因而"倾向于表达因果关系,"从而"倾向于表达目的关系;"从而"要求前后句法成分的行为主体一致,其后是动词性结构。"从而"、"因而"都是从跨层非短语结构词汇化为连词的,语境相似,不过"因而"受到了"因"等词语用推理的影响,随着语言使用的分工,"因而"在语义、句法上显现出与"从而"的诸多不同。 "Cong' er"is different from "yirt'er" in semantic feature and syntax. Firstly,"yin' er" trends to express the causal relation while "cong' er" expresses the proposal relation. Secondly, is that "cong' er" has the syntactic restriction to its governing elements that the subject must be identical and the behind element be verbal groups. Though "tong' er" and "yin' er" lexicalized in conjunctions from the cross-combinations with the similar context, "yin ~ er" has some differences from "cong' er" for it has been influcenced by "yin" and "yinci" in its lexicalized process.
作者 李小军
出处 《汉语学习》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第1期50-56,共7页 Chinese Language Learning
关键词 从而 因而 功能差异 词汇化 "cong' er" (从而) "yin ' er" (从而) functional differences lexicalization
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献18

  • 1沈家煊.“语用否定”考察[J].中国语文,1993,(5):321-331.
  • 2张谊生.现代汉语虚词[M].华东师范大学出版社,2000..
  • 3王维贤.《论转折句》[J].《中国语言学报》,1991,(4).
  • 4王伟1998.《“能”的个案:现代汉语情态研究的认知维度》,中国社会科学院研究生院语言系硕士论文.
  • 5Bybee, Joan,R. Perkins & W. Pagliuca 1994 The Evolution of Grammar - Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  • 6Ducrot, O. 1984 Le dire et le dit. Paris: Minuit.
  • 7Grice, H.P. 1975 Logic and conversation. InCole, P&J. Morgan (eds.) Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press. 41 - 58.
  • 8Lakoff, G. & M. Johnson 1980 Metaphors We Live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • 9Lyons, J. 1977 Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • 10Searle, John 1969 Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

共引文献1003

同被引文献135

引证文献11

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部