期刊文献+

罚款对城市居民个人用水行为的影响

The Effect of Penalty on Civil Water Use
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以城市居民用水两难情景为实验任务,探讨了处罚(罚款)对城市居民个人用水行为的影响。结果表明:相对只是对违规的个体进行处罚的方式,个体-群体其他成员处罚的方式更能约束人们的不良行为发生相对于现行水价标准,5.4元的超水高额处罚标准很可能是人们的一个心理接受节点,高于该金额的水费处罚标准人们可能将难以接受。 Taking the water resource dilemma as the experimental task, the current study is aimed to investigate and diseuss the effect of penalty on city dwellers' self- management of water use. The results indicated:different ways of penalty lead to different effects on people's decision-making. The way to punish the individual is more effective than the group punishment, and it can restrain people' s selfish behavior. Compared with the penalty for the individual, the individual-group penalty can restrain people's selfish behavior more effectively. Further, the higher the penalty, the more effective it will be. For the current water price, the penalty standard of 5.4 Yuan is very likely to be an acceptable node for people, whereas the penalty higher than 5.4 Yuan could be unacceptable.
作者 王沛 汲慧丽
出处 《应用心理学》 CSSCI 2008年第2期149-154,172,共7页 Chinese Journal of Applied Psychology
关键词 社会两难决策 水资源 城市用水 罚款 social decision dilemma, water resource, civil water use, penalty
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1严进 王重鸣.两难对策中价值取向对群体合作行为的影响[J].心理学报,2000,3:332-332.
  • 2严进,王重鸣.群体任务中合作行为的跨阶段演变[J].心理学报,2003,35(4):499-503. 被引量:13
  • 3Dawes R M. Social dilemmas. Annual Review of Psychology, 1980,31 : 169 - 193
  • 4Mulder L B,Van Dijk E, De Cremer D, Henk A M Wilke. Undermining trust and cooperation: The paradox of sanctioning systems in social dilemmas. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2006,42 ( 2 ) : 147 - 162
  • 5Rapoport A,Au W T. Bonus and penalty in common pool resource dilemmas under uncertainty. Organizational behavior and human decision processes ,2001,85 ( 1 ) : 135 - 165
  • 6Fehr E, Gachter S. Altruistic punishment in humans. Nature ,2002,415 (6868) : 137 - 140
  • 7马剑虹,刘满霞.社会两难行为理性特点的实验分析[J].心理科学,2006,29(2):290-293. 被引量:7
  • 8Kiyonari T,Tanida S ,Yamagishi T. Social exchange and reciprocity:confusion or a heuristic? Evolution and Human Behavior,2000,21(6):411 -427
  • 9Kelley H H, Stahelski A J. Social Interaction Basis of Cooperators' and Competitors' . Beliefs about Others. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1970,16( 1 ) :66 -91
  • 10丰琳,马剑虹.资源两难问题的研究及其新进展[J].心理科学进展,2003,11(3):345-349. 被引量:7

二级参考文献34

  • 1[1]Komorita S S, Parks C D. Interpersonal Relations: Mixed-Motive Interaction. Annual Review of Psychology, 1995, 46: 183~207
  • 2[2]Komorita S S, Parks C D. Social Dilemmas. Westview Press.1996, 25~26
  • 3[3]Levine J M, Moreland R L. Progress in small group research. Annual Review of Psychology, 1990, 41: 585~634
  • 4[4]Hardin G. The Tragedy of the Commons. Science, 1968, 162: 1243~1248
  • 5[5]Deutsch M. Equity, Equality, and Need : What determines which value will be used as the basis of distributive Justice. Journal of Social Issues, 1975, 31: 137~149
  • 6[6]Allison S T, Messick D M. Social Decision Heuristics in the Use of Shared Resources. Journal of Behavior Decision Making, 1990, 3: 195~204
  • 7[7]Rutte C G, Wilke H A M, Messick D M. Scarcity or abundance caused by people or the environment as determinants of behavior in the resource dilemma. Journal of Experiment Social Psychology, 1987, 23: 208~216
  • 8[8]Samuelson C D, Messick D M. Alternative Structural Solutions to Resource Dilemmas. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1986, 37: 139~155
  • 9[9]Rutte C G, Wilke H A M. Preference for decision structures in a social dilemma situation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1985, 15: 367~370
  • 10[10]Samuelson C D, Messick D M, Rutte C G, et al. Individual and structural solutions to resource dilemmas in two cultures. Journal of Personality and Social psychology, 1984, 47: 94~104

共引文献30

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部