期刊文献+

Rambus案最新进展与政府在标准化制度中的作用 被引量:2

下载PDF
导出
摘要 介绍标准中知识产权Rambus一案的最新进展,分析支持FTC申请美国最高法院实施案件审查的"法庭之友"文件,建议为了保证标准化制度的正常运行,政府应当对于由私有组织控制的标准化制度加强管理,考虑采取反垄断法作为规制的法律基础,以促进市场竞争,保护消费者和公共利益。
作者 丁蔚
出处 《电子知识产权》 CSSCI 2009年第2期26-29,共4页 Electronics Intellectual Property
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1丁蔚.Rambus专利侵权诉讼与标准中知识产权的管理[J].电子知识产权,2007(2):45-48. 被引量:6
  • 2FTC. [2007-02-05 ] .http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2007/ 02/070502rambus.htm.
  • 3Rambus v FTC (DC Circuit decision)[EB/OL].[2008 -01 - 10 ]. http://www.scribd.com/doc/3505378/Rambusv-FTC-DC-Circuit-decision.
  • 4DC Circuit Court Overturns Federal Trade Commission Orders in Rambus Case[EB/OL].[2008-01-10]. http: //www.rambus.com/us/news/press_releases/2008/080422. html.
  • 5FTC v. Rambus, on Petition for Writ of Certiorari, to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, Petition for a Writ of Certiorari and Appendix Volume 1 of 2[EB/OL].[2008-12]. http://www.ftc.gov/os/caselist/ 0110017/081124rambuspet.pdfi
  • 6No. 08-694, FTC v. Rambus, on Petition for writ of Certiorari, to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, Brief of Arnici Curiae American Antitrust Institute, Consumer Federation of America and Public Patent Foundation in support of Petition for Writ of Certiorari [EB/OL]. [2008 -12]. http://www.scribd.com/doc/ 9631606/Amicus-Brief-of-American -Antitrust -Institute - in-Support-of-Petition-in- FTC-v-Rambus.
  • 7No. 08-694, FTC v. Rambus, on Petition for Writ of Certiorari. to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, Brief for Nanya Technology Corporation as Amicus Curiae in Support of Petitioner[EB/ OL].[2008-12]. https://web2.westlaw.com/expo/linkviewer. wl?RS =WLW6.06&VR =2,0&SV =Split&FN = top&MT = Bank -ruptcy&TF =649&TC =I&RD =FIP -BRIEF&standalone=Y.
  • 8[美]Mark A. Lemley.lntellectual Property Rights and standard-Setting Organizations [EB/OL]. [2008-02-06 ]. http://papers.ssm.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=310122.
  • 9[美]David A. Balto. Standard Setting in the 21st Century Network Economy; Computer and Intemet Lawyer, 2001 - Aspen Publishers.
  • 10No. 08-694, FTC v. Rambus,on Petition for Writ of Certiorari, to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, Advanced Media Workflow Association (AMWA); Consumer Electronics Association (CEA); Globalplatform Inc.; Ires Global Learning Consortium, Inc. (IMS); International Imaging Industry Association, inc. (I3A); IPC, Association Connecting Electronics Industries; Linux Foundation; MIDI Manufactures Association: Mobile Printing and Imaging Consortium, Inc.: Open Geospatial Consortium, Inc. (OGC); OpenSAF Foundation; Organization for the Advancement of Structured Information Standards (OASIS); PICMG-PCI Industrial Computer Manufacturers Group, Inc. (PICMG); Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers (SMPTE); The Open Group (TOG); The Software Defined Radio Forum., Inc.; Video Electronics Standards Association (VESA); VEMBus International Trade Association (VITA); XBRL International. inc[EB/OL]. [2008-12]. http:// www.scribd.com/doc/9391954/Amicus -Brief of -Standards-Setting- Organizations-in-FTC-v-Rambus.

二级参考文献16

  • 1JEDEC,"About JEDEC",http://www.jedec.org/Home/about_jedec.cfm。2006年12月10日访问。
  • 2Robert E.Payne."United States Courc of Appeals for the Federal Circuit",http://www.ll.georgetown.edu/federal/judicial/fed/opinions/01opinions/01-1449.html,2006年12月26日访问。
  • 3Michael Kanellos,"Court rules against Rambus",http://news.com.com/2100—1001-257339.htinl?legacy=cnet.2006年12月26日访问。
  • 4Tom Krazit."Analysts:Rambus case to alter standards-setting rules",http://www.infowodd.com/article/03/01/30/030130hnrambus_1.html.2006年12月16日访问。
  • 5Tom Krazit,Rambus,Infineon end DRAM dispute,sign licensing deal,http://computerworld.com.sg/ShowPage.aspx?pagetype=2&articleid=230&pubid=3&issueid=29,2007年1月8日访问。
  • 6Skip Oliva,"Rambus,Antitrust&the Common Law"。http//www.overlawuered.com/2007/01/rambus_an_titrusr_the_common_la.btml.2007年1月3日访问
  • 7FTC,"Initial Decision Released in Rambus Case".http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2004/02/rambusid.htm.2006年12月22日访问。
  • 8FTC's Bureau of Competition."FTC Finds Rambus Unlawfully Obtained Monopoly Power",http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2006/08/rambus.htm,2007年1月8日访问。
  • 9David Balto."FTC v.RAMBUS:Time to Reexamine Standard Setting Rules",http://www.abanetorg/antitrust/committees/intell_property/ftcrambus.doc,2006年12月20日访问.
  • 10FTC,"In the Matter of Rambus Incorporated".http://www.ftc.gov/os/adjpro/d9302/index.htm.2006年12月20日访问。

共引文献5

同被引文献11

引证文献2

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部