4Yoav Oestreicher, the Rise and Fall of the "Mixed" and "Double" Convention Models Regarding Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgements, 6 Wash. U. Global Stud. L. Rev. 2007. pp342- 343.
5Dicey & J. H.C. Morris, The Conflict of Laws, 10th ed. 1980, pp1037 -38.
6Zaphiriou, tradional Recognition and Enforcement of Civil judgments,53 Notre Dame L. Rev. 1978 p749.
7Hilton v. Guyot, 159 U.S. (1895).
8Marcia McCrory Ernst, Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Money Judgement in the United States and the United Kingdom in Light of Currency Conversion Problems, 3 Emory J. Int'l Disp. Resol. 1988 - 1989, p66.
9Yoav Oestreicher, the Rise and Fall of the "Mixed" and "Double" Convention Models Regarding Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgements, 6 Wash. U. Global Stud. L. Rev. 2007, p363.
4Jerry L. Mashaw,Administrative Due Prooess the Quest for a Dignitary Theory, in Boron Universiry Law Reres, Vol.61,1981.
5Jerry L. Mashaw,Due Prooess in the Administrative State,1985 by Yale University Press.
6R. Saphire, Specifying Due Process Values:Towards a More Responsive Approach To Prccedural Protection,in University of Pesylvanis Law Review, Vol, 127,1978.
7Stewart,The Reformation of American Administrative Law,88Harvard Law Review,1975.
8Robert S. Summers,Evaluating and Improving Legal Process-A Plea for "Process Value", in Cornell Law Review,Vol. 61,1981., pp. 885 - 931.
9Gerald J. Postema, the Principle of Utility and the Law of Procedure: Bentham's Theory of Adjudication, in Georgia Law Review, Vol. 11.1977.
10E. Pincoffs, due Proeess, Fraternity, and a Kantian Injunction,in Due Process,Pennock and Chapman ( eds. ) ,pp.172-181.
