期刊文献+

典型生物标志物诊断值t检验在溢油鉴别中的评价应用 被引量:5

Application and evaluation in oil spill identification by diagnostic ratio t-test for representative biomarkers
下载PDF
导出
摘要 从具体的一起溢油事件中取样,获得岸滩溢油A和来自两个油田的原油样B,C,D。将溢油样(A)和三个嫌疑源样品(B,C,D)借助色质联用仪进行检测,选用m/z57和m/z191两组特征离子群做标志物的诊断处理,比对三组置信区间的散点分布情况,A-B与A-C在98%的置信度水平有较宽的误差阈,A-D置信度水平为95%,误差阈较窄。检验出了嫌疑源原油样品D是鉴定评价的目标,和溢油样A匹配最佳。这与实验室间的同步检验的结果是一致的,通过对油样分析的例证,本文从试验的匹配结果阐明t检验在鉴定中的可靠性。t检验在与其他系统的分析结果校核时,体现出统计方法的独特功能。在标志物的项目空间扩大和溢油样本空间不断丰富的基础上,t检验更具有实用性,可以反映出更深层次的信息,从而有助于后期法证环节达到系统化。 Sampling from an oil spill incident, there are the beach spill sample A and crude oil sample B, C and D, from two different oilfields. The determinations of the beach spill sample (A) and samples ( B, C and D) of suspect sources were made by GC-MS combining instrument. The biomarkers of m/z57 and m/zl91 ion groups selected are diagnostic treated, while comparing confidence interval scatter distribution of three sets. On level of 98% confidence degree is wider threshold of error to sets of A-B and A-C, and 95% to set of A-D is narrower. Then the suspect source sample D comes to be the target of identification evaluating, matching best with spill sample A. that agrees with the synchronous test result inter-laboratory. It is clarified that the dependability of t-test, while the i- dentification from the matching of testing result, is as an analytic case. The t- test shows the special function when checked with the analytic results from other systems, based on the item space enlarging of biomarkers and spill samples enriching, t-test will be more usable, giving more information, so that help to systematize forensic step later.
出处 《海洋环境科学》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2009年第1期41-44,共4页 Marine Environmental Science
关键词 T检验 诊断值 生物标志物 溢油鉴定 t-test diagnostic ratio biomarker oil spill identification
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

二级参考文献40

共引文献84

同被引文献48

  • 1杨家稳.提高泛函网络泛化能力的一种t检验法[J].滁州职业技术学院学报,2009,8(4):67-70. 被引量:1
  • 2何晓媛,石金辉,辛海虹.南海区平台石油的特征荧光光谱分析[J].海洋环境科学,2004,23(4):60-63. 被引量:10
  • 3魏福祥,王振川,王金梅.乙酰胆碱酯酶生物传感器法测定蔬菜水果中有机磷农药残留[J].食品科学,2007,28(2):229-231. 被引量:21
  • 4GB/T21247-2007,海面溢油鉴别系统规范[S].
  • 5Femandez-Varela R, Andrade J M, Muniategui S, et al. The comparison of two heavy fuel oils in composition and weathering pattern, based on IR, GC-FID and GC-MS analyses: Application to the Prestige Wreackage [J]. Water Research, 2009, 43(4) : 1015-1026.
  • 6Wang Z D, Fingas M F, David S. Oil spill identification [J]. Journal of Chromatography A, 1999, 843 (1-2) : 369-412.
  • 7Ezra S, Feinstein S, Pelly I, et al. Weathering of fuel oil spill on the east Mediterranean coast, Ashdod, Israel [J]. Organic Geochemistry, 2000, 31 (12): 1733-1741.
  • 8Wang Z D, Fingas M F. Development of oil hydrocarbon fingerprinting and identification techniques [ J ]. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 2003, 47(9-12) : 423-452.
  • 9Yim U H, Oh J R, Hong S H, et al. Identification of PAHs sources in bivalves and sediments 5 years after the sea prince oil spill in Korea [J]. Environmental Forensics, 2002, 3 (3-4) : 357-366.
  • 10STOUT S A, UHLER,A D, MCCARTHY K J. A strategy and methodology for defensibly correlating spilled oil to source candi- dates[ J ]. Environ Forensics, 2001 (2) :87-98.

引证文献5

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部